Critics’ reviews

Paranormal Activity (2007)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 76: 10 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Paranormal Activity

76
Positive
10
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics are frightened by it. The praise falls almost entirely on the same few things: the fixed camera in the bedroom, which has viewers scanning the frame for anything out of place; the sound design, which makes a creak or a thud stand in for effects; and the two leads, whose performances several reviewers find believable enough to sell the found-footage conceit. Several also credit Oren Peli’s patience in holding a shot well past comfort.

The reservations are about the shape rather than the scares. Slant finds the storytelling too schematic and the explanations unnecessary, while Empire and HeyUGuys both think the final stretch abandons the plainness that made the earlier scenes work. Several critics warn that it only works if the viewer plays along. The Hollywood Reporter alone tips negative, finding the slow build a test even though the scares eventually land. The spread is otherwise narrow, from strong recommendations to qualified ones.

Total Film
19 November 2009 · ★★★★★ · Jamie Graham
100

Graham gives the film a glowing verdict, calling its stripped-down approach deeply frightening. He praises the carefully composed bedroom scenes, which make viewers scan the frame for danger.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 November 2009 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw finds the film genuinely frightening and calls it a claustrophobic classic. He praises its ingenious found-footage approach and the believable performances of Katie Featherston and Micah Sloat.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 October 2009 · Betsy Sharkey
80*

Sharkey finds the film an effective, anxiety-inducing psychological thriller, despite its simple story. She singles out Oren Peli’s use of the unseen and minimal effects to create fear.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones finds the film unoriginal but surprisingly effective at building dread. He praises its use of primal fears of darkness and the unknown.

Read the full review →
Empire
22 October 2009 · Simon Crook
78*

Crook finds the film potent and genuinely frightening, though its final stretch weakens the found-footage realism. He praises the static bedroom shots and sound design for turning mundane details into sources of dread.

Read the full review →
The Independent
29 November 2009
67*

The review finds the film effective at delivering chills, though its appeal depends on viewers being receptive to its setup. It praises the scares created through suggestion, especially the long shot of an empty room.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
2 November 2009 · Brent Simon
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. No specific praise or complaint is available in the visible text.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 October 2009 · ★★½/4 · Rob Humanick
62

The review finds the film accomplished but only intermittently effective, stopping short of its full potential. It praises the creative use of limited resources while faulting the overly schematic storytelling and explanatory details.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
24 September 2009 · Kevin Lally
40*

Lally finds the film’s slow buildup testing, though it eventually delivers effective scares. He praises the bedroom surveillance sequences and the leads’ naturalistic performances, while faulting the drawn-out pacing.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
13 November 2009 · Ben Rawson-Jones
90*

The critic finds the film exceptionally effective and frightening, provided viewers immerse themselves in it. They single out the bedroom’s static-camera scenes and Peli’s instinctive timing for praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
8 October 2009 · 5 out of 5 · Kwame Shorter
86*

The critic gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it a refreshing alternative to gore-heavy horror. They single out its use of sound and atmosphere to unsettle viewers without relying on elaborate effects.

Read the full review →
Collider
6 January 2010 · Andre Dellamorte
85*

The critic calls the film an absolute blast and a model of how horror should work. He especially praises its patient pacing and precisely timed scares, which make simple effects feel frightening.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
12 November 2009 · 9 out of 10 · Gary Phillips
78*

The critic finds the film exceptionally frightening and highly effective. They single out the suspenseful bedroom shot for praise, but feel the ending is too Hollywood-style.

Read the full review →
NME
27 November 2009 · Owen Nicholls
70*

The critic recommends the film as a clever, unsettling watch, while warning that expectations of the scariest film ever may disappoint. They praise its believable central relationship and its use of the audience’s imagination.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate