Critics’ reviews

Posse (1993)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 59: 2 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Posse

59
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
2
Los Angeles Times
14 May 1993 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
88*

Wilmington finds the film a rousing, exuberant entertainment whose excesses are part of its appeal. He praises its revisionist effort to spotlight Black people largely overlooked in Hollywood Westerns.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
80*

The critic presents the film as a vigorous, incisive Western. They praise Tone Loc’s co-star Lane’s puckish comic performance for bringing levity to the bloody action.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 April 1993 · Todd McCarthy
65*

McCarthy finds the film lively and appealing, though its crowded plotting and weak dramatic build keep it from reaching emotional depth. He praises its revisionist portrayal of Black cowboys and the cast’s infectious energy.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The review's verdict cannot be established from the accessible page. Its specific praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 May 1993 · Janet Maslin
50*

The review gives the film a mixed verdict. It singles out its revisionist Western approach, while finding the execution uneven.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · empire
35*

The review finds the film entertaining but ultimately thin, with more style than substance. It faults the revisionist Western for repeating genre conventions rather than meaningfully subverting them.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
30*

The review finds this revisionist Western scattered and ultimately ineffective. It singles out the historical reminder that one third of cowboys were Black, but says the film fails to make its ideas land.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate