
Most critics admire Public Enemies more than they enjoy it. Of twenty reviews, ten are mixed and only three are hostile, and the praise is almost unanimous about one thing: the way Michael Mann and his camera handle the 1930s. The nighttime shootouts, the Little Bohemia sequence above all, are singled out again and again, along with the production design and the natural light. Johnny Depp’s controlled Dillinger is the performance most often picked out, with Marion Cotillard a close second.
The complaints are just as consistent. Reviewers find the film emotionally cool, Dillinger himself opaque, the romance thin and the supporting figures, Christian Bale’s Purvis in particular, barely sketched. The spread is wide, from a strong recommendation at Empire down to outright dismissals at The Hollywood Reporter and Digital Spy. The digital look also divides: Radio Times calls the lighting vibrant, The AV Club finds it a flaw. The Guardian, almost alone, counts Depp’s restraint against the film.
E
Empire
13 January 2009 · Ian Nathan
85*
Nathan finds the film intelligent, challenging and worth the effort it demands. He particularly praises its immersive digital recreation of the 1930s and Marion Cotillard’s performance as the story’s emotional centre.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80
The critic presents the film as a strong, documentary-style crime drama. They praise its cast, sumptuous production design, and vibrant natural lighting.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
16 June 2009 · ★★★★ · Rob James
80
The critic finds the film a startling, atmospheric crime epic, though its supporting characters remain ciphers. He praises Mann’s vivid visual style and the romance’s tragic heartbeat.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
1 July 2009 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75
Ebert finds the film stylish but emotionally cool. He singles out Johnny Depp’s controlled performance as a strength.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
28 June 2009 · David Denby
70*
Denby finds the film visually ravishing and expertly directed, but says its emotional distance and underdeveloped view of Dillinger keep it from greatness. He especially praises Mann’s lucid, fast-moving direction and elegant visual style.
Read the full review →V
Variety
24 June 2009 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
65*
McCarthy finds the film admirable but not electrifying, with its meticulous historical tapestry making a stronger impression than its overall impact. He particularly praises the Little Bohemia shootout, where the nighttime cinematography and gunfire stand out.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
· Andrew Sarris
64*
The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no details about what the review praises or criticizes.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
24 June 2009 · Tim Grierson
64*
The review's verdict and specific praise or complaint are unavailable in the visible page text. The page identifies the film and critic but exposes only a paywall shell.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
30 June 2009 · C+ · Keith Phipps
63
Phipps finds the film disappointingly smaller than life, despite its audacious refusal to mythologize Dillinger. He praises a fleeting farmhouse scene and a thrilling nighttime chase, but faults the unfocused storytelling, digital-video look, and lifeless romance.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
28 June 2009 · ★★½/4 · Nick Schager
62
Schager finds the film visually potent but dramatically underdeveloped and ultimately uninvolving. He praises the action sequences’ muscular framing and movement, while faulting the central romance for feeling thin and contrived.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
30 June 2009 · ★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60
Johnston gives the film three out of five, suggesting a mixed verdict. The teaser foregrounds the hunter-and-hunted pairing and invokes Mann’s Heat as a comparison.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
1 July 2009 · A.O. Scott
50*
The review gives the film a mixed verdict, finding it engaging but not fully successful. It singles out Johnny Depp’s performance as John Dillinger for praise.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
2 July 2009 · Peter Bradshaw
45*
Bradshaw finds the film potent and confident, but says its ingredients do not quite come together. He praises the forceful gunfight sequences while faulting Depp’s emotionally restrained performance.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
30*
The critic finds the film visually accomplished but ultimately unsuccessful, with Dillinger left emotionally opaque and the story lacking tension. They praise the performances, dialogue and Mann’s compelling attempt, despite its failure to bring the story together.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
24 June 2009 · Kirk Honeycutt
30*
Honeycutt finds the film sprawling and unable to make Dillinger or the other figures compelling, despite its star cast. He praises the smoothly staged shootouts and strong cinematography, but says the human element goes missing.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
4 November 2009 · 4 out of 5 · Simon Brew
77*
Brew finds the film flawed but absorbing, and better than its divisive reputation suggests. He particularly praises Johnny Depp’s characterisation of Dillinger, while noting that Purvis and the romance receive too little development.
Read the full review →N
NME
4 July 2009 · Owen Nicholls
70*
The critic recommends the film as intelligent, complex and tense, despite some pacing and visual-style complaints. They single out the chemistry and performances of Johnny Depp and Marion Cotillard for praise.
Read the full review →C
Collider
1 December 2009 · Andre Dellamorte
65*
The critic finds Public Enemies solid and interesting, but less cohesive and compelling than Michael Mann’s best work. They praise its immaculately staged heists and nighttime shootout, while noting the film’s ideas never fully come into focus.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
13 July 2009 · Stephen Carty
55*
Carty finds the film competent and a refreshing change from blockbuster fare, but not among Michael Mann’s best. He praises two quieter sequences, especially Dillinger’s unnoticed visit to the police squad room.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
30 June 2009 · Stella Papamichael
20*
The critic finds the film dull and argues that Michael Mann misses the point by privileging Dillinger’s legend over the facts. They single out the one-sided portrayal of Dillinger and the G-Men as especially damaging, while noting that Christian Bale and Billie are short-changed.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate