Critics’ reviews

Quincy (2018)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 62: 2 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Quincy

62
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified appreciation of Quincy, with praise clustering around its archival footage, musical history and access to Jones and his inner circle. The warmer responses find an affectionate, convincing portrait, with intimate material bringing fresh life to familiar career milestones. Even some sceptical notices acknowledge Jones’s charisma, though the film’s straightforward approach earns more approval as a tribute than as a searching examination of its subject.

The sharpest divide concerns whether that affection leaves enough space for scrutiny. The Los Angeles Times finds Rashida Jones’s treatment of her father loving and clear-eyed, while The Hollywood Reporter sees insufficient critical distance and The Guardian finds his flaws glossed over. Reservations also gather around scattered storytelling, conventional structure and pacing. The spread is wide: the strongest objections concern how little the film discovers, rather than simply how it arranges a crowded life.

IndieWire
9 September 2018 · B+ · Jude Dry
83

The review calls the documentary an inspiring and fitting tribute to Quincy Jones. It praises its intimate archival moments and the wealth of music history, while noting its straightforward style.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 September 2018 · Noel Murray
75*

Murray finds the documentary loving and clear-eyed, though somewhat scattered. He praises Rashida Jones’s affectionate framing of her father’s life and flaws.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 September 2018 · Andrew Barker
65*

Barker finds the documentary a loving, convincing portrait, though its conventional structure and pacing keep it from fully encompassing Jones. He praises the archival footage for bringing fresh life to familiar career milestones.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked by a browser check, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is available from the text provided.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 September 2018
64*

The page could not be accessed, so its critical verdict cannot be established. The supplied text does not reveal what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 September 2018 · festival review · Stephen Dalton
55*

The critic finds the documentary engaging and sweet, but too close to a gushing vanity project. He praises Jones’s charisma and the rich access to his inner circle, while faulting the film for its lack of critical distance and tighter structure.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 September 2018 · festival review · Charles Bramesco
25*

The critic finds the documentary a sanitized, unexamined victory lap that fails to make its subject fully come into focus. He praises the rare moments when Jones reflects on mortality, but faults the film for glossing over his flaws and offering little fresh insight.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate