Critics’ reviews

Ransom (1996)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 67: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Ransom

67
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics find Ransom an effective thriller, and the praise lands first on Mel Gibson, whose performance as the desperate father is singled out by nearly every review that reaches a verdict. The early stretches draw the warmest notice: the build-up of tension, the tightly controlled suspense and the way the twists are parcelled out. Gary Sinise’s villain is also admired, with more than one critic crediting him for wry touches in a role that might have been flat.

The reservations gather around the second half. Several reviews find the script mechanistic, the focus diffuse and the final reel a let-down, and the Radio Times thinks Ron Howard’s direction unusually starchy for him. The spread is moderate rather than wide: most land somewhere between a grudging and a solid pass, with the Los Angeles Times the one outright dissenter, arguing that the shift into vigilante drama derails a film that had been working well. Two reviews offer no readable verdict.

Variety
4 November 1996 · Todd McCarthy
85*

McCarthy calls the film a highly entertaining, well-constructed thriller. He particularly praises Mel Gibson’s performance and the film’s tightly controlled suspense.

Read the full review →
Total Film
7 February 1997 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review calls it a solid, entertaining thriller that lacks the tension its premise promises. It praises Mel Gibson’s edgy performance and the film’s strongest set-pieces, while faulting the diffuse focus and underdeveloped villain.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
75*

The critic finds the thriller ruthlessly effective despite a mechanistic script and a disappointing final reel. They praise the sustained tension and strong performances from Mel Gibson and Gary Sinise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
8 November 1996 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert finds the film an effective, tense thriller. He singles out Mel Gibson’s performance as a strength.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 November 1996 · Janet Maslin
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no basis for identifying what the review praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available page text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It describes the ransom demand and Tom Mullen’s decision to involve the FBI.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

Jones finds the remake entertaining but weakened by Ron Howard’s unusually starchy direction. He singles out Gary Sinise for adding wry twists to the villainous role.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 November 1996 · Kenneth Turan
35*

Turan finds the thriller effective for much of its length but says its turn toward vigilante drama derails it. He praises the early tension-building and carefully parcelled twists, while faulting the implausible decision that makes Gibson’s distraught father a vigilante.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate