
Most critics greet Ratatouille with enthusiasm, praising the animation’s detail, colour and movement, particularly in its Parisian streets and busy kitchens. The depiction of food draws repeated admiration for suggesting taste and smell through images alone. The reviews also value Brad Bird’s storytelling, its warmth towards an outsider and its belief in artistic ambition. Peter O’Toole’s performance as food critic Anton Ego stands out among the voice work, while several critics find emotional substance in the film’s treatment of cooking and creativity.
Reservations mostly concern length, occasional dull stretches and comedy that could be sharper. The spread is wide, though dissent is scarce: Eye for Film finds the dream-chasing story familiar and the talky approach potentially less appealing to children. The Skinny is more dismissive, admiring the visuals but finding the plot muddy and the characters less memorable than Pixar’s earlier creations. Even these dissenters acknowledge its visual accomplishment.
G
The Guardian
12 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · Xan Brooks
100
The critic loved the film for its masterful animation technique with a richer palette and its heartfelt parable of illegitimacy and the outsider.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
12 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · Sukhdev Sandhu
100
The critic calls it a wonderful film and Brad Bird's most daring and brilliant creation, singling out a moving scene about food, memory and identity.
Read the full review →T
The Times
11 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · James Christopher
100
The critic hails the film as marvellous and an extraordinary demonstration of animation evoking taste and smell, praising the rat's-eye view of Paris and Peter O'Toole's voice performance.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
8 October 2007 · ★★★★★ · Wally Hammond
100
The critic calls it one of the most witty, clever, gently moral and visually stimulating family entertainments of the year. They single out the extraordinary and occasionally breathtaking animation along with vivid characters such as the food critic Anton Ego.
Read the full review →E
Empire
28 September 2007 · Ian Nathan
95*
The critic calls it Pixar’s masterpiece, praising its rich storytelling, inventive animation, and emotional depth as a rat dreams of becoming a chef in Paris. Brad Bird is highlighted for his auteur-like direction and the film’s joyful, life-affirming qualities.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
20 June 2007 · festival review
90*
The critic declares it hard to imagine any other film coming close in this or any year, praising its rich, complicated, intelligent storytelling and unprecedented animation style and movement. They single out the sophisticated blend of human and animal characters, warm characterizations and wealth of detail.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
16 July 2007 · David Denby
90*
The critic praises the film's moment-by-moment craftsmanship and its ardent celebration of the chef as artist. They single out the detailed depiction of the kitchen geography and the championing of excellence.
Read the full review →V
Variety
18 June 2007 · Justin Chang
85*
The critic describes it as delicious and a warm and irresistible concoction. They single out the joy of artistic creation in the kitchen scenes and the stunning visual delights.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
80
The critic says the film measures up to the best of Pixar and delivered the best family comedy of the year. They single out the brilliant comic turns, especially Peter O'Toole as the food critic Anton Ego, and the sensational animation.
Read the full review →The review admires the film’s brilliant imagination, memorable characters, and stunning visualization under Brad Bird, noting it sets a new benchmark despite some dull patches and excessive length. It praises the realistic storytelling and attention to detail over typical animated tropes.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
10 October 2007 · Nigel Andrews
75*
The critic finds the movie a riot of invention with stunning images and sophisticated characters, though it could be a tiny bit funnier, and praises its charm and food visuals.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
25 June 2007 · Nick Schager
The critic hails the film as a Pixar return to form and a boisterous ode to culinary art, egalitarianism and Paris, commending its peerless CG detail, inventive humor and democratic spirit. The verdict finds the praise for director Brad Bird richly deserved.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
14 June 2007 · Kirk Honeycutt
The critic praises Brad Bird and Pixar's unbeatable combination in crafting a charming story of a rat pursuing haute cuisine, noting the film's sensuous depiction of food and technical leaps in CGI. The verdict celebrates it as a delightful, imaginative triumph with broad appeal.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
29 June 2007 · Critic’s Pick · A.O. Scott
The critic calls it a nearly flawless piece of popular art and one of the most persuasive portraits of an artist ever committed to film. They single out its celebration of the passionate pursuit of excellence.
Read the full review →P
Paste
29 June 2007 · Tim Basham
85*
Director Brad Bird delivers another emotionally rich animated film with strong storytelling and memorable characters. The critic singles out the heartfelt narrative and the way it makes viewers root for the rat chef without revulsion.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
19 July 2007 · Tony Sullivan
60*
The critic finds Ratatouille a pleasant but disappointing Pixar effort that feels like it could have been made live-action, with solid voice work and Parisian visuals but lacking the technical wow factor of prior films. The familiar chase-your-dreams plot and talky tone are noted as potential drawbacks for younger viewers.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
8 October 2007 · ★★ · Paul Greenwood
40
Pixar's follow-up to Cars is a visually accomplished but underwhelming animated feature whose plot feels muddy and whose characters lack the memorability of the studio's earlier work.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate