RBG (2018)

O'Sullivan gives the documentary an enthusiastic verdict, calling it revealing and inspiring. She singles out its warm, candid portrait of Ginsburg's marriage and family life.

Turan finds the documentary completely engrossing and admiring, presenting Ginsburg as a force whose influence began well before the Supreme Court. He especially praises her eloquence and candid presence, alongside the film’s attention to her marriage and personal life.

Kolhatkar is mesmerized by the documentary and finds it informative and inspiring. She praises its account of Ginsburg’s landmark legal work and its portrait of her partnership with her husband.

The review makes a strong case for the documentary’s importance. It singles out Ginsburg’s serene yet forceful presence as compelling to watch.

Webb finds the documentary an uplifting, timely celebration, though it sometimes makes Ginsburg seem too cute. She praises its account of Ginsburg’s perseverance and the landmark work that advanced women’s rights.

The critic finds the documentary solid and quietly eloquent. She praises its capture of Ginsburg’s lasting impact as a feminist pioneer.

Felperin finds the documentary warmly reassuring and admiring, though it leaves Ginsburg somewhat enigmatic. She praises its fine-grained portrait and absorbing anecdotes, while noting that it never fully penetrates Ginsburg’s reserve.

Nicholson finds the documentary a cheerful, inspiring portrait that celebrates Ginsburg’s patient work for equality. She singles out the moving account of Ruth and Marty Ginsburg’s marriage as the film’s best part.

Edelstein finds the documentary affectionate and largely hagiographic, but cheeky and ultimately compelling. He especially praises its account of Ginsburg’s methodical, case-by-case fight against gender inequality and the thrill of hearing her arguments.

The page could not be accessed, so its verdict cannot be verified. The review’s specific praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

The critic finds the documentary superficial and unconvincing in its portrayal of Ginsburg. He faults it especially for glossing over her judicial career and reducing its interviewees to generic praise.

The critic finds the documentary hagiographic and frustratingly superficial in its treatment of Ginsburg’s legal work. He singles out its reduction of landmark victories and legal arguments to slogans and catchy phrases.

Hammond finds the documentary an inspiring, rich portrait of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her significance. He especially praises its moving account of Ginsburg’s lifelong romance with her husband Marty.

Goldberg calls the documentary a rousing celebration, though its attention to Ginsburg’s celebrity sometimes feels excessive. He praises its account of how her legal work reshaped America and highlights her supportive marriage as a moving personal element.

The review finds the documentary an effective, moving tribute, though it stays too surface-level in places. It especially praises its portrayal of Ruth and Marty Ginsburg’s unusually supportive marriage.

The review finds the portrait powerful and engaging, while noting that its upbeat approach limits dissenting perspectives. It praises the film for revealing Ginsburg’s personality and showing how her persistent legal strategy advanced equality.

The critic finds the documentary proficient but overly surface-level, ultimately more legend-printing than revealing. They praise its portrait of Ginsburg’s life and accomplishments but fault its shallow treatment of her legal legacy and modern fame.