Critics’ reviews

Red River (1948)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 83: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Red River

83
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Red River, with praise clustering around Hawks’s direction and the tension between John Wayne and Montgomery Clift. The reviews repeatedly find psychological depth in the Western, singling out Wayne’s challenging performance, Clift’s charisma and the affection beneath the central conflict. Hawks’s staging also draws praise, alongside his patient development of the cattle-drive ensemble and his attention to the journey rather than simply its destination.

The differences are chiefly in the degree of enthusiasm, with most assessments grouped towards the favourable end of the scale. The AV Club gives particular weight to the emotional force of the ending, while other reviews emphasise the film’s humane treatment of its characters. Specific reservations are harder to establish: the two lowest-scored entries have no verifiable review text, so neither supplies a reliable account of where the praise gives way to doubt.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

Sloman calls the film one of American cinema’s finest achievements and praises Hawks’s filmmaking. He singles out John Wayne’s performance and Montgomery Clift’s star-making turn.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
90*

Newman praises the film as a deeper, emotionally powerful Western, with a particularly strong climax. He singles out Hawks’s lyrical staging and the leads’ performances as highlights.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 June 2014 · Mike D'Angelo
90*

D’Angelo regards Red River as one of the most revered Westerns and praises its emotionally potent, thoroughly Hawksian ending. He also singles out Montgomery Clift’s charismatic performance and the gradual emergence of the central conflict from deep affection.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
85*

The review describes Hawks’ adaptation as a sheer delight. It particularly praises the film’s engaging portrayal of the establishing of the Chisholm Trail.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
18 June 2014 · Matt Brennan
82*

Brennan regards Red River as a humane, inventive frontier classic. He praises Hawks’ focus on the journey and the unsettled spaces between destinations, rather than on a fixed endpoint.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1947 · Variety Staff
82*

The review is strongly positive, calling the film a masterful interpretation of its western story. It especially praises Hawks's direction and Montgomery Clift's sympathetic performance.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 June 2014 · ★★★★ · Jordan Cronk
80

Cronk praises Red River as an unusually humane and psychologically rich western. He singles out Hawks’s careful development of the cattle-drive ensemble and the film’s deflation of masculine posturing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 October 2013 · Philip French
80*

French presents the film as a landmark western that brought psychological complexity to the genre. He praises Wayne’s challenging performance and highlights the film’s characteristic Hawksian themes.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
73*

The URL identifies this as a Great Movies review of the 1948 film. The page itself is blocked, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 October 1948 · Bosley Crowther
66*

The URL identifies this as a New York Times screen review of the 1948 film. The article text is unavailable, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate