Critics’ reviews

Rendition (2007)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 55: 2 positive, 5 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Rendition

55
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
3

Most critics agree that Rendition has chosen a subject worth the trouble: extraordinary rendition and the intersecting lives of those caught up in it. Even the cooler reviews grant that the film is earnest and well intentioned, and the warmer ones call it powerful and provocative, with the murky politics of the war on terror giving the drama a convincing backdrop. Praise for the acting settles on Jake Gyllenhaal, whom Eye for Film singles out as well cast, and Total Film finds the performances convincing and the final turn earned.

The reservations are about the drama rather than the subject. The commonest complaint is flatness: Empire says the slick visuals cannot make the separate storylines cohere, and Variety goes further, calling the film dull and faulting low-key performances from Gyllenhaal and Reese Witherspoon. The New York Times finds it dramatically unconvincing, and even the sympathetic Eye for Film says the subplot slows the pace and the ending strains belief. The spread is wide, with the middle settling on three stars.

Total Film
19 October 2007 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review calls the film powerful and politically challenging. It praises the convincing performances and a final twist that feels narratively earned.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 September 2007 · festival review
70*

The review presents the film as smart and provocative. It praises the war on terror’s murky complexities as a compelling backdrop.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page displays a browser verification challenge rather than the review. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
8 September 2007 · festival review
64*

The available text provides no critic’s verdict. It identifies the film’s focus as torture in the war against terrorism but offers no specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Dave Aldridge
60

The review presents the film as a politically charged thriller, earning a three-star rating. It singles out the subject of extraordinary rendition and the intersecting stories of those caught up in it.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 October 2007 · ★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60

The printed 3/5 rating indicates a measured, middling verdict. The review text is unavailable, so its specific praise or complaint cannot be established.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 October 2007 · A.O. Scott
40*

The review finds the film earnest but dramatically unconvincing. It criticizes the way the story handles its serious subject matter.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 September 2007 · Angie Errigo
30*

Errigo finds the film disappointingly flat despite its serious subject and well-intentioned message. She singles out the slick visuals, while saying they fail to make the separate storylines cohere.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 September 2007 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
20*

McCarthy finds the film dull and says its restrained melodrama drains an explosive subject of life. He particularly criticizes the opaque, low-key performances and lack of spark from Jake Gyllenhaal and Reese Witherspoon.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 October 2007 · Val Kermode
65*

Kermode finds the film powerful and gripping, though its subplot slows the pace and the ending strains credibility. She praises Jake Gyllenhaal’s casting and says the subject deserves wider attention.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate