Critics’ reviews

Rising Phoenix (2020)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 72: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Rising Phoenix

72
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Rising Phoenix, with praise centred on the Paralympians’ personal stories and the force of the sporting footage. The reviews generally find it an affecting, accessible introduction to the Games, admiring the athletes’ strength and skill as well as the polished visual treatment. Several welcome its challenge to pity-based portrayals of disability, finding that the emphasis on sporting achievement gives the athletes their due.

The reservations concern how insistently the film steers those stories towards uplift. IndieWire admires the dramatic editing but finds some subjects underdeveloped, while The Guardian considers the cutting frenetic and the score relentlessly uplifting. The spread includes a sharp dissent from Eye for Film, which values the historical material and archive footage but finds the present-day portrayal patronising. Its objection goes beyond presentation: it argues that an overcoming-the-odds narrative squeezes out the variety of the athletes’ lives.

Los Angeles Times
26 August 2020 · Kevin Crust
85*

Crust gives the documentary an enthusiastic verdict, calling it a fitting bridge to the postponed Olympics. He praises its glossy visual style and its portrayal of the athletes’ strength and finesse.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
27 August 2020 · B+ · Ryan Lattanzio
83

Lattanzio gives the documentary a strong positive verdict, calling it a winning homage to Paralympic athletes. He praises its cinematic visual style and dramatic editing, while noting that its crowded focus occasionally leaves subjects underdeveloped.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
25 August 2020 · 4/4/4 · Lillian Crawford
80

Crawford finds the documentary a powerful, uplifting celebration of resilience. She especially praises the emotional force of the athletes’ sporting footage.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
20 August 2020 · Tim Grierson
80*

The critic finds it a rousing, crowd-pleasing introduction to the Paralympic Games. The riveting sports footage and athletes’ compelling personal stories are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
21 August 2020 · Grace Henry
75*

The review presents the documentary as an inspiring celebration of Paralympic athletes. It praises the film for challenging pity-based views of disabled people and highlighting their strengths.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 August 2020 · Leslie Felperin
70*

Felperin finds the documentary affecting and its athletes’ stories compelling, though its presentation can feel overbearing. She singles out the athletes’ fortitude for praise, while criticizing the relentlessly uplifting score and frenetic editing.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page appears to be a review of the specified film, but its contents are inaccessible. I cannot verify the critic’s verdict or what the review praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 August 2020
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied page.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
26 August 2020 · Chloe Timms
80*

The critic calls the documentary an important, powerful film that challenges perceptions of disability. She especially praises its superhero-style introduction to Paralympians and its portrayal of athletes’ strength and skill without reducing them to stories of hardship.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 February 2021 · Jennie Kermode
25*

The critic finds the documentary’s present-day portrayal of disabled people naïve, patronising and overly triumphant. She praises its historical material and archive footage, while lamenting that the athletes’ diverse lives are squeezed into an overcoming-the-odds narrative.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate