Critics’ reviews

Robin Hood (2010)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 52: 2 positive, 6 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Robin Hood

52
Positive
2
Mixed
6
Negative
6

Most critics find Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood a competent, serious-minded origin story that is harder to enjoy than it ought to be. The praise, where it comes, goes to Scott’s robust handling of the battles, the castle siege and the climactic beach landing in particular, and to the supporting cast: Oscar Isaac’s Prince John and Cate Blanchett’s Marion are singled out more often than Russell Crowe’s Robin. The period production design and Marc Streitenfeld’s score also draw approving mentions.

The reservations cluster on tone and plotting. The reviews call it joyless and overburdened with set-up, short on the merriment and playfulness the legend usually brings, and several say the historical muddle leaves Robin without a clear purpose. Crowe divides them: some admire the physical performance, others think he is simply miscast. The spread is wide, from Empire, which finds it refreshingly grown-up, to Eye for Film, which thinks it need not have been made at all.

Empire
1 February 2007 · Dan Jolin
75*

Jolin finds the film entertaining and refreshingly grown-up, with a lively, coherent story. He especially praises Oscar Isaac’s flamboyant Prince John, while faulting the bloodless action and shifting accents.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 May 2010 · festival review · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds the grim origin-story entertaining and engaging despite its shortage of merriness. He praises Scott’s robust direction and the film’s energetic battles and political intrigue.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 May 2010 · festival review · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies it as a Cannes review, but the critic's verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Anna Richards
60

Richards finds Scott’s politically complex take on the legend engaging, though the romance distracts and the folk-dancing scenes feel pointless. She singles out the romance with Marion as well handled, despite its distraction from the story.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · festival review · Kirk Honeycutt
60*

Honeycutt finds the film an energetic but uneven epic, with its historical muddling and sidelined Robin Hood lore undercutting its appeal. He praises Scott’s muscular direction and action choreography, along with Marc Streitenfeld’s score.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 May 2010 · ★★★ · Tom Huddleston
60

Huddleston gives the film three out of five stars. The available text singles out the expectation of a straight rerun of Gladiator, but does not reveal his full verdict or other points of praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 May 2010 · ★★ · Andy Lowe
40

Lowe gives the film a strongly negative verdict, calling it bloated and joyless. He praises Cate Blanchett’s performance but criticises the bland battles and Russell Crowe’s delivery.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 May 2010 · ★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
38

Gonzalez finds the film sluggish, politically simplistic, and stylistically empty. He praises its convincing Medieval production design but criticizes its shallow characterization and cacophonous direction.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 May 2010 · festival review · Kenneth Turan
30*

Turan finds the film frustrating and poorly conceived despite the talent involved. He particularly faults its cumbersome, over-plotted story for awkwardly combining too many ideas.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
12 May 2010 · ★★★ · Luke Savage
60

Savage finds the film too serious and overburdened by its origin-story setup, though it eventually hits its stride. He praises its visceral castle siege, handsome visuals, and Russell Crowe’s physical performance.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
11 May 2010 · Stella Papamichael
40*

The review finds the film entertaining but unfocused, lacking the drive and urgency of Gladiator. It praises the spectacle of the climactic beach battle while faulting Robin’s unclear purpose and the film’s uncertain tone.

Read the full review →
Paste
14 May 2010 · Sydney Slotkin
35*

The review finds the film a passable Hollywood epic but says its familiar story and complicated plot lack depth. It criticizes the long, chaotic battle scenes and Crowe’s limited vulnerability.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 July 2010 · Stephen Carty
20*

The critic finds the film an unnecessary, poorly executed take on the Robin Hood legend. They particularly fault Russell Crowe’s miscasting and the film’s slow pace, saying it lacks the character’s spirit and playfulness.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate