Critics’ reviews

Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 50: 3 positive, 0 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves

50
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
4

The reviews are sharply divided on Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, with a slight majority finding its swashbuckling pleasures insufficient. Praise clusters around Alan Rickman’s extravagant Sheriff of Nottingham, whose comic energy appeals to enthusiasts and detractors alike. Morgan Freeman also earns favourable mentions. The more enthusiastic critics enjoy the action, irreverence and entertainment value, with Radio Times singling out Kevin Reynolds’s imaginative staging and roving camera as reasons the familiar adventure works.

The divide concerns whether those pleasures survive the storytelling. Detractors find the film muddled, overlong or dutiful, with contemporary social themes awkwardly imposed on the legend. Kevin Costner’s lead performance draws recurring criticism, even from supporters: Den of Geek enjoys the film despite considering him miscast. The spread is wide rather than cautiously mixed. What some critics accept as spirited disorder leaves others bored, with Rickman often providing the chief relief.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic praises this swashbuckling 12th-century adventure for its handsome entertainment value and panache. Kevin Reynolds is singled out for his imaginative staging and roving camera that turn familiar events into an enjoyable popcorn epic, with strong mentions of Costner, Rickman and Freeman.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · CM
70*

The review finds the mix of comedy, 90s sensibility and swashbuckling action more hit than miss, calling it spirited and irreverent despite a slapdash overall effect. It notes the pace picks up in conflict with the hammy Sheriff but is not for those who prefer myths kept sacred.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
40*

The film is fun and frantic in places but flawed by a turgid script, historical inaccuracies, and uneven performances, with Costner sleepwalking through the lead role. It is saved from dreariness largely by Alan Rickman's gleeful, campy turn as the Sheriff of Nottingham.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 June 1991 · Kenneth Turan
40*

The critic describes the film as muddled and overlong, trying to please everyone with a jumble of action, preaching and comic antics. He notes Costner's awkwardness in the lead role and the New Age elements imposed on the legend.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 June 1991 · Vincent Canby
30*

The critic calls the film a mess and a joyless reconstruction of the legend that pushes contemporary social themes. He singles out the performances of Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio as Marian and Morgan Freeman as Azeem as the only entertaining elements.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
24 June 1991 · Terrence Rafferty
20*

The critic finds the film a dull and dutiful trek through the legend with no real affection for the story. He singles out Alan Rickman's florid performance as the Sheriff for providing the only moments of glee.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
18 June 2009 · ★★★★ · Simon Brew
80

The critic finds the film one of the most enjoyable blockbusters of the 1990s despite its flaws and Kevin Costner's miscasting. Alan Rickman's scene-stealing performance as the Sheriff of Nottingham is singled out as the standout element.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate