Critics’ reviews

Romancing the Stone (1984)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 69: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Romancing the Stone

69
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics find Romancing the Stone a lively, likeable adventure, with praise centred on its old-fashioned escapism, comic energy and romantic leads. Kathleen Turner’s performance draws particular approval, as does her chemistry with Michael Douglas: their verbal sparring gives the action a welcome lightness. The favourable reviews also enjoy the treasure-hunt ingredients and the heroine’s growing resourcefulness, generally accepting the familiar storytelling as part of the pleasure.

The reservations concern originality and the assumptions behind the romance, though their severity varies considerably. Some otherwise appreciative reviews acknowledge dryness or familiar plotting. Variety is cooler about the heroine’s transformation, treating it as a predictable screen formula. Slant Magazine offers the sharpest dissent, arguing that the film’s xenophobia and male self-importance make its adventure a defence of white male protection. The spread is therefore wider than the broadly favourable consensus might suggest: the objections extend beyond how efficiently the entertainment works.

The Hollywood Reporter
26 March 1984 · Arthur Knight
85*

Knight considers it a superior, highly entertaining adventure that knows exactly what it is. He particularly praises Kathleen Turner’s transformation into a daring, resourceful heroine.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic praises the film as a lively, old-fashioned adventure with clever humor and top-notch action. Kathleen Turner’s exhilarating performance and chemistry with Michael Douglas stand out.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
75*

The review finds the film lively, entertaining adventure fare. It praises Douglas and Turner’s chemistry, the exuberant direction, and DeVito’s performance.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 March 1984 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert regards the film as an enjoyable adventure. He praises its lively old-fashioned escapism.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 March 1984 · Janet Maslin
70*

Maslin’s review is broadly positive about the film as an entertaining action comedy. It singles out the comic energy of the adventure.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· JP
70*

The review presents the film as engaging wish-fulfilment. It singles out the lively combination of treasure maps, crocodiles and romantic adventure.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
1 September 2006 · ★★/4 · Paul Schrodt
50

Schrodt gives the film a negative verdict, calling it a Douglas vanity project. He criticizes its xenophobia and male self-importance, which he says turn its adventure-romance template into an un-ironic defense of white male protection.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1983 · Variety Staff
45*

The excerpt offers only a faintly critical verdict, suggesting the heroine’s transformation follows a familiar screen formula. It singles out the story’s expected complications but gives no clear praise of a performance or craft element.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 July 2010 · Stephen Carty
75*

Carty finds the film an enduringly likeable adventure, despite some dryness and questions of originality. He singles out the natural chemistry and verbal sparring between Douglas and Turner as the film’s chief strength.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate