Critics’ reviews

Rosemary's Baby (1968)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 80: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Rosemary's Baby

80
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Rosemary’s Baby, with praise clustering around Polanski’s control of atmosphere and the performances of Mia Farrow and Ruth Gordon. The reviews repeatedly credit the film with making paranoia persuasive, allowing uncertainty to build slowly rather than forcing the horror. Farrow draws particular praise for her performance and casting, while Gordon’s comic eccentricity is another strength. The adaptation also earns approval for its intelligence and fidelity to its source.

The differences are chiefly differences of emphasis, with few explicit reservations in the available text. Slant Magazine stresses the violation of women’s autonomy and the way the film encourages viewers to dismiss Rosemary’s suspicions; other reviews concentrate on suspense, performance and the intrusion of horror into ordinary pregnancy. The scores suggest some variation in enthusiasm, but the RogerEbert.com entry contains no accessible verdict, so it cannot establish a substantive dissent.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

Jones praises the film as an impeccable, faithful adaptation. He singles out Mia Farrow’s casting and Polanski’s atmospheric handling of paranoia.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1967 · Variety Staff
85*

The review calls the film excellent and says Polanski triumphs in his first U.S.-made picture. It singles out Mia Farrow’s performance and the film’s suspenseful climax for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
80*

Errigo praises the film as expertly made, high-class horror. She singles out Ruth Gordon’s inspired performance as Minnie, whose comic eccentricity makes her role in the satanic conspiracy especially effective.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 June 2013 · ★★★★ · Eric Henderson
80

Henderson sees the film as an enduring cautionary tale about women’s autonomy being violated. He praises Polanski’s slow-burn uncertainty, which makes viewers question Rosemary’s suspicions and implicates them in dismissing her.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
70*

The review describes the film as a supremely intelligent and convincing adaptation. It singles out the adaptation’s handling of Ira Levin’s Satanist thriller for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The URL identifies a review of the specified film, but the blocked page reveals no critical verdict. No praise or complaint can be confirmed from the available text.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 January 2002 · Amber Wilkinson
80*

Wilkinson finds the film an enduringly chilling, well-crafted supernatural thriller. She particularly praises Mia Farrow and Ruth Gordon, and the subtle way the horror overlays ordinary experiences of pregnancy.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate