Critics’ reviews

Rush Hour 2 (2001)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 52: 2 positive, 5 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Rush Hour 2

52
Positive
2
Mixed
5
Negative
5

The reviews lean towards mixed and negative, though even several detractors find something to enjoy in the performers. Praise clusters around Jackie Chan’s physical comedy, his chemistry with Chris Tucker, and Zhang Ziyi’s forceful screen presence. Chan’s acrobatic slapstick and individual action sequences provide the most consistent pleasures, while Zhang earns approval across otherwise sharply divided assessments. The central partnership still works for several critics who find the sequel disappointing.

The disagreement is over how much those strengths compensate for repetition, thin plotting and abrasive humour. Variety regards the familiar formula as a strength and finds the sequel superior; Empire thinks it loses the original’s fun and is less entertaining than its outtakes. Elsewhere, reservations focus on Tucker overwhelming Chan, race-based jokes that grate, and action that lacks invention. The spread is wide: the same familiarity reads as enjoyable continuity to some critics and a dispiriting rehash to others.

Variety
27 July 2001 · Robert Koehler
85*

Koehler praises the sequel as a superior, energetic action comedy that preserves the original’s winning formula. He singles out Chan and Tucker’s chemistry and Zhang Ziyi’s screen presence, while noting that the first fight disappoints.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 August 2001 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds it enjoyable, though it requires some indulgence even from Jackie Chan fans. He praises Zhang Yiyi’s striking presence as an action heroine.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
30 July 2001 · Emanuel Levy
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the paywall shell does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no readable detail about what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 August 2001
64*

The page appears to be a review of Rush Hour 2, but its text is inaccessible. The critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the available page.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
60*

The critic finds the film intermittently entertaining but misses Jackie Chan’s earlier knockabout charm. The action set-pieces, especially the Las Vegas battle, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
3 August 2001 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The critic finds the sequel familiar but entertaining, with the leads still making a satisfying team. Jackie Chan’s acrobatic slapstick is the standout, while the race-based humour can grate.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 August 2001 · ★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
38

Gonzalez dismisses the film as bland and not worth a lengthy critique. He singles out Zhang Ziyi as its saving grace, praising the moments when she knocks Chris Tucker’s character into silence.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
30*

Thomas finds the sequel an inferior follow-up that loses the original’s sense of fun. He praises Jackie Chan’s graceful action and notes Zhang Ziyi’s forceful turn, but concludes the film is less entertaining than its outtakes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 August 2001 · Kenneth Turan
30*

Turan finds the sequel familiar, plot-thin, and too self-satisfied, despite the stars’ enduring chemistry. He praises Jackie Chan’s physical inventiveness and Chris Tucker’s comic energy, while noting that the funniest moments arrive in the outtakes.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 August 2001 · Scott Tobias
30*

Tobias judges the sequel a disappointing, mercenary rehash of the original. He praises the chemistry between Chan and Tucker, but complains that Tucker’s shrill comedy overwhelms Chan’s less inventive action.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
30*

The available description suggests a critical view of the comedy. It singles out jokes about Asians’ stature and the American character’s presence in Hong Kong as complaints.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate