Critics’ reviews

Rush Hour (1998)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 71: 5 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Rush Hour

71
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics find Rush Hour an enjoyable, familiar action comedy whose chief strength is the partnership between Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker. Praise centres on their contrasting comic styles, with Chan’s acrobatic action playing effectively against Tucker’s more frantic humour. The reviews repeatedly credit that rapport with making the material work, even when the plot offers little surprise, and Chan’s action sequences receive particular approval.

The main difference is how far the double act compensates for the formula. Radio Times finds that the pairing lifts the film above the usual buddy comedy, while Empire calls it an effective crowd-pleaser but faults the weak script and slow start. The Los Angeles Times praises the brisk pacing, though it finds a Hong Kong sequence elliptical. The assessable verdicts therefore range from qualified enjoyment to firm enthusiasm, with reservations clustering around the writing rather than the stars.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic says the film rises above the usual buddy-movie formula. Chan and Tucker’s inspired double act is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 September 1998 · KEVIN THOMAS
75*

Thomas finds the action comedy formulaic but funny, with Chan and Tucker making an effective team. He praises the stars’ contrasting comic styles and the film’s brisk pacing, while faulting an elliptical Hong Kong sequence.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 September 1998 · Janet Maslin
70*

Maslin gives the action comedy a positive verdict. She singles out the comic chemistry between Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 September 1998 · Joe Leydon
70*

Leydon finds the formulaic action comedy raucously entertaining and sees it as a savvy career move for Jackie Chan. He praises the lively chemistry between Chan’s acrobatics and Chris Tucker’s manic humor.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
65*

Westbrook finds the film an effective, if brainless, crowd-pleaser despite its weak script and slow start. She singles out Jackie Chan’s balletic action sequences as the highlight.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page URL identifies a RogerEbert.com review of the 1998 film, but the review text is inaccessible. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CO'Su
64*

The page identifies this as a film review, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic finds the film fun and says its familiar plot matters less than its central double act. Chan and Tucker’s rapport is singled out as the source of the humour.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate