Critics’ reviews

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1960)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 78: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

78
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics respond favourably to Saturday Night and Sunday Morning, with praise clustering around Albert Finney’s performance as Arthur Seaton. The reviews credit him with making Arthur’s cynicism, laddishness and resignation vivid and credible, giving familiar material much of its force. The script also earns praise, while the strongest notices place the film among the leading examples of British kitchen-sink drama.

The recorded scores range from enthusiastic to mixed, with none classed as negative, though the available text gives limited grounds for explaining every reservation. Variety finds the film absorbing but not especially likeable, while praising Reisz’s documentary-informed direction for the convincing industrial-town atmosphere of its locations and interiors. Two other reviews lack accessible verdicts, so their reservations cannot be established: the clearest documented qualification concerns the film’s appeal rather than the credibility of its setting.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Parkinson praises the film as a classic drama and highlights Albert Finney’s astonishing performance. He singles out Finney’s ability to convey Arthur Seaton’s cynicism, laddishness and resignation.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
90*

Parkinson regards the film as one of the finest entries in the British kitchen-sink tradition. He especially praises Albert Finney’s electrifying performance and the strength of the script.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 November 1960 · Guardian staff reporter
82*

The critic finds the film triumphantly overcomes familiar themes and becomes a genuine work of film art. They single out Albert Finney’s vivid, credible performance as the chief reason for its success.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TM
78*

The available metadata identifies this as a review and describes the film as a major British New Wave box-office success. It singles out the hero’s defiant watchword as part of the film’s appeal.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1959 · Variety Staff
65*

The review finds the film good and absorbing, though not very likeable. It praises Reisz’s documentary-informed direction for giving the locations and interiors an authentic industrial-town atmosphere.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Max Nelson
64*

The available text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no specific praise or complaint about the film.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 April 1961 · Bosley Crowther
64*

The article is a review of the film, but its verdict is unavailable in the accessible page. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied text.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate