Critics’ reviews

Scarface (1932)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 81: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Scarface

81
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics regard Scarface as a major early gangster film whose force survives its historical importance. Praise centres on Hawks’s inventive direction: the opening tracking shot, expressive shadows, visual contrasts and rapid montage give the violence pace and character. The reviews also find considerable wit beneath the brutality, with several praising the dark humour, lively script and cast, while its depiction of gangster style is repeatedly credited with helping establish the genre’s conventions.

The spread is broadly favourable rather than unanimous, with seven positive assessments, two mixed and none negative. Reservations concern the film’s moralising and the handling of its cruelty: the Los Angeles Times notes the unusual combination of brutality and preachiness, while Variety finds it unusually cruel, though softened by moralising and punishment. Variety also singles out George Raft’s restrained, coin-tossing performance as a source of sympathy within that harsher assessment.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adrian Turner
100

Turner calls it the greatest gangster film of the 1930s, and even the greatest ever. He praises its gritty realism, while noting that Hollywood’s moral watchdog interfered with the production and ending.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
6 July 2021 · Richard Brody
95*

Brody regards the film as a landmark of cinematic modernity, praising its audacity and lasting power. He especially singles out Hawks’s inventive direction, from the opening tracking shot to the striking visual contrasts throughout.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· PT
90*

The review presents the film as both historically seminal and still exhilarating. It singles out its brilliance as a landmark of early gangster cinema.

Read the full review →
Empire
21 March 2007 · Kim Newman
85*

Newman regards the film as a true classic of the gangster genre. He praises its atmospheric, darkly comic tone and sizzling script and cast.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · The Standard
85*

The critic finds the film remarkably fresh and influential despite its age. They single out its vivid depiction of gangster style and the conventions it helped establish.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 May 1991 · MARK CHALON SMITH
80*

Smith considers the film one of the best early gangster movies, praising its wit and building velocity. He singles out its consistently interesting visual style while noting its unusual mix of brutality and preachiness.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 November 2024 · ★★★★ · Derek Smith
80

Smith praises the film’s enduring swaggering power and its balance of social commentary with offbeat humor. He singles out Hawks’s rapid-fire montage and expressive shadows as especially potent.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 May 1932 · Mordaunt Hall
65*

The article is identifiable as a review, but its text is inaccessible here. I cannot verify the critic’s verdict or what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1932 · Variety Staff
50*

The review finds the film unusually cruel, though its moralizing and punishment of sinners soften the impact. It singles out George Raft’s restrained, coin-tossing performance for sympathy.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate