Critics’ reviews

Scooby-Doo (2002)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 45: 0 positive, 5 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Scooby-Doo

45
Positive
0
Mixed
5
Negative
6
Variety
9 June 2002 · Joe Leydon
65*

Leydon finds the film fast, frenetic and amusing, though its plotting and some action sequences are muddled. He especially praises the seamless integration of Scooby-Doo’s CGI animation with the live-action cast.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
21 June 2002 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies this as Mike Goodridge’s review, but the review text is behind an access wall. Its verdict and any specific praise or criticism cannot be determined from the available page.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
64*

The available text is too limited to establish the critic’s overall verdict. It notes that the breezy CGI ghosts and fart jokes are aimed at younger viewers.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 June 2002 · ★★/4 · Roger Ebert
50

Ebert’s verdict is mixed, finding the film only modestly entertaining. He singles out its broad, cartoon-like comedy as its main appeal.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Sloan Freer
40

Freer finds the film colourful but woefully misjudged. She faults its self-conscious cleverness for undermining the story, while its adult-targeted references and childish gags fail to come together.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 July 2002 · ★★ · Total Film
40

The critic calls the adaptation misjudged and disappointing, with appeal mainly for very young viewers. They praise the casting and Matthew Lillard’s Shaggy, while faulting Scooby’s poorly rendered CGI.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 June 2002 · ★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
38

Gonzalez gives the film a sharply negative review, arguing that it fails to capture what made the television series compelling. He singles out the self-conscious performances and Gosnell’s direction as major weaknesses.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 December 2002 · 1 star · Rob Mackie
38*

The critic finds the film witless, formless and dispiriting. He singles out its pointless humor and complains that the cast’s performances cannot redeem it.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Chris Hewitt
30*

Hewitt finds the film mostly disappointing and aimed too narrowly at young children, though its short runtime makes it relatively painless. He praises Matthew Lillard and Linda Cardellini for capturing their cartoon counterparts, while criticizing Scooby’s unconvincing CGI.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
10*

The critic strongly dislikes the film and says it is a letdown. The review singles out the dog’s farting-and-belching contest as especially unpleasant.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 July 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
65*

The critic finds the film’s frenetic, cartoon-like fun appealing, though its plot eventually becomes an afterthought. He particularly praises Matthew Lillard’s performance and the way it supports Scooby’s computer-generated character.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate