Critics’ reviews

Senso (1954)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 76: 6 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Senso

76
Positive
6
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Senso, with praise clustering around Visconti’s use of colour, framing and period detail. The reviews repeatedly single out the painterly staging and cinematography, from the opera house opening to the military panoramas, as central to its emotional force. Several also admire its treatment of destructive passion, finding a romantic tragedy that both celebrates love and exposes the lovers’ moral decline.

Reservations centre on how convincingly the central attachment develops, rather than on the film’s visual craft. Variety finds the love story shaky while crediting the direction, lighting and production detail with keeping it compelling; The AV Club is much more enthusiastic but also questions how fully the lovers’ bond is established. The available verdicts range from qualified admiration to strong praise, with no outright rejection, though the limited accessible material for several entries leaves parts of that spread unexplained.

The AV Club
9 March 2011 · A- · Scott Tobias
90

Tobias praises the film’s lush, operatic style and its emotionally powerful portrayal of destructive passion. He notes that Visconti does not fully establish how the lovers’ magnetic bond forms, but singles out the beautifully rendered Venice as a strength.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
1 May 2011 · Richard Brody
85*

Brody presents the film as an evocative, emotionally charged work rooted in Italian history. He especially praises Visconti’s exacting use of color, detail, and framing.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 February 2011 · ★★★★ · Bill Weber
80

Weber regards the film as a near-definitive work of cunning artifice. He particularly praises the painterly staging and the subtle, splendid Technicolor visuals.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
79*

The inaccessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict or what they single out. Its URL identifies it as a Great Movies piece about the requested film.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
29 November 2018 · Kenneth Turan
75*

Turan finds the film a distinctive, enduring celebration and mockery of romantic love. He especially praises its lush cinematography, from the opera house opening to the military panoramas.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TR
66*

The available metadata describes the film as sumptuous but does not reveal the review’s overall verdict. It singles out the Technicolor expressionism and the perspective on heterosexual love.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 July 1968
65*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict or what the article singles out. The headline indicates coverage of the film’s Bleecker Street arrival, but the article text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1953 · Variety Staff
65*

The review praises the film’s visual elegance but finds its central love story shaky. It singles out Visconti’s direction, cinematography, lighting, and production detail as strengths that keep the film compelling.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 November 2007 · Merlin Harries
78*

The critic praises the film as a subversive and technically accomplished romantic tragedy. The striking cinematography and Visconti’s treatment of the lovers’ moral decline stand out.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate