The review calls the documentary unforgettable. It singles out its account of the Everest disaster from the Sherpas’ perspective.
Read the full review →Critics’ reviews
Sherpa (2015)
11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 79: 9 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.
The critic gives the documentary an enthusiastic recommendation, praising its visual magnificence and political urgency. She especially singles out the compelling human drama between guide Phurba Tashi Sherpa and expedition operator Russell Brice.
Read the full review →Kuipers gives the documentary a strongly positive verdict, praising its visual magnificence and emotional force. He especially highlights the filmmakers’ balance of intimate Sherpa stories with the disaster’s rescue efforts and political fallout.
Read the full review →The review finds the documentary spectacular, intimate and politically provocative. It praises the film’s forceful examination of Sherpas’ dangerous work and exploitation by Westerners.
Read the full review →O'Sullivan finds the documentary tense, fascinating and eye-opening, while noting that it avoids sentimentalising its subject. She praises its stark exposure of the dangerous, often unnecessary labor Sherpas perform for Everest tourists.
Read the full review →The critic finds the documentary compelling and damning in its account of Sherpa exploitation. He praises its sensitive portrayal of the community and its history, with the tragedy on the mountain intensifying its message.
Read the full review →Parkinson regards the documentary as compelling and astute. He praises its stunning vistas and intimate insights into Sherpa life.
Read the full review →Barnes calls the documentary smart, genuine and thoughtful. He praises its account of Sherpa workers recognizing their power after the deadly avalanche.
Read the full review →Puddicombe gives the documentary a clearly positive assessment, noting its damning view of the Everest industry. He praises how Peedom builds tension and uses candid footage to expose Western climbers’ entitled attitudes.
Read the full review →The page identifies this as Sarah Ward's review, but the paywall hides her verdict. No specific praise or complaint is available in the accessible text.
Read the full review →The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no praise or complaint to summarize.
Read the full review →