Critics’ reviews

Shrek Forever After (2010)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 57: 5 positive, 6 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Shrek Forever After

57
Positive
5
Mixed
6
Negative
4

Most critics agree the fourth Shrek is a step up from the third, with more heart than its immediate predecessor, though few are moved beyond mild approval. The praise clusters on the premise, an alternate world borrowed from It’s a Wonderful Life, and on two supporting turns: Rumpelstiltskin as a lively villain and Antonio Banderas’s Puss in Boots. Several reviews also like the renewed emotional business between Shrek and Fiona and call it a decent place to stop.

The reservations are about freshness. A clear minority find it tired and lazy, recycling the first film’s story without taking its characters anywhere; The AV Club says it wastes the chance to look properly at Fiona and the costs of parenthood, and Variety calls the animation dated. The 3D divides the reviews almost evenly. The spread is wide, and the warmer notices come mostly from the British press, with Empire and HeyUGuys at the top.

Empire
1 June 2010 · James White
85*

The critic finds the fourth film a satisfying return to form and says the franchise is going out on a high. He praises its focus on character and the renewed emotional arc between Shrek and Fiona.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 May 2010 · Betsy Sharkey
78*

Sharkey finds the film a welcome return to form, with more heart and cleverness than its predecessor. She especially praises the emotional depth and the animation’s successful partnership with 3-D.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
1 July 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds it an enjoyable, good-natured family comedy and a pleasing end to the series, while hoping it really is the last installment. He praises its relaxed feel and entertaining villain, Rumpelstiltskin, but notes that the franchise has lost the original film’s subversion and impact.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
22 April 2010 · David D'Arcy
64*

The review’s verdict is not available in the accessible page text. No praise or complaint can be identified because the article is behind a paywall.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Andrew Collins
60

The review finds the fourth Shrek film dull in its domestic setup but more engaging once its darker alternate world emerges. It praises the cleverly conceived, dystopian take on It's a Wonderful Life.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 June 2010 · ★★★ · Anna Smith
60

The available page information does not reveal Smith’s verdict. The standfirst singles out the film’s sci-fi parallel-universe premise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 May 2010 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

Schager finds the film innocuous but unnecessary, arguing that its story repeats the first film without developing its characters. He singles out Rumpelstiltskin’s manic energy as a bright spot in otherwise tepid proceedings.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · The Associated Press
35*

The critic finds the fourth installment entertaining but tired, with less charm, humor, and heart than its predecessors. Banderas’s scene-stealing Puss in Boots is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 May 2010 · Tasha Robinson
30*

Robinson finds the film dispiriting, faulting its lazy execution and recycled story ideas. She singles out its squandered potential to explore Fiona’s life and the costs of parenthood.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 April 2010 · festival review · John Anderson
30*

Anderson finds the film an underwhelming, dated installment that borrows too heavily from ‘It’s a Wonderful Life.’ He praises the sight gags and the vocal performances of Eddie Murphy and Antonio Banderas, despite criticizing the animation’s dated look.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
25 June 2010 · Colin Hart
85*

The critic finds it a fitting finale that far exceeds expectations. They praise the engaging plot, strong returning cast, and effective use of 3D.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
11 June 2010 · Mayer Nissim
75*

The critic finds this a satisfying, touching finale that restores the series’ sense of fun. The story’s balance of heartfelt moments and jokes earns praise, while the ineffective 3D is the main complaint.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
24 May 2010 · ★★★ · Ron Hogan
60

Hogan finds the film a decent but unnecessary end to the series, with little of the humor or charm of the earlier entries. He praises the occasional sweet moments and musical cues, while faulting the weak comedy and largely unused 3D.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
7 July 2010 · Tony Sullivan
50*

The critic finds the film merely okay, though funnier and edgier than its predecessor. He praises Puss-in-Boots’ performance but faults the 3-D presentation and the new villain’s voice work.

Read the full review →
NME
· Andrea Hubert
35*

Hubert finds the sequel tired and only okay, though it reasonably justifies its existence. She praises its occasional return to the franchise’s dark comic vein and its clever use of 3D in tunnels and hallways.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate