Critics’ reviews

Six Minutes to Midnight (2020)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 42: 1 positive, 3 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Six Minutes to Midnight

42
Positive
1
Mixed
3
Negative
6

Most critics are unimpressed. The consensus is that Six Minutes to Midnight has an intriguing historical premise and spends it on a conventional spy thriller, with several reviewers saying the real history of the school is more fascinating than anything the film does with it. Where there is praise it goes to Judi Dench, whose performance is picked out for giving her character an emotional coherence the rest of the cast lacks, and in passing to the Welsh scenery and Marc Streitenfeld’s score.

The reservations cluster on the plotting, which the reviews call clichéd, creaky and meandering, with stock characters and perfunctory dialogue. Eddie Izzard divides them: Time Out finds the performance stiff and The Guardian calls the casting a mistake, while Eye for Film, the one clearly positive review, praises Izzard for carrying the character’s many sides. The spread is wide, from Vulture, which finds the film underwritten and television-like, to HeyUGuys, which thinks the second half rescues a slow first.

The New York Times
25 March 2021
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60

Johnston finds the historical premise intriguing but says the film settles into conventional spy-movie plotting. He praises the fascinating historical material, while faulting the film for lacking Hitchcockian verve.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 March 2021 · ★★ · Phil de Semlyen
40

The review finds the spy thriller disappointing and short of Hitchcockian. It singles out Eddie Izzard’s stiff performance as a weakness.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 March 2021 · Gary Goldstein
30*

Goldstein finds the thriller largely ho-hum and its plot creaky rather than engaging. He criticizes the perfunctory action and dialogue, and says the underdeveloped characters make their motives hard to care about.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 March 2021 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

Bradshaw finds the wartime spy drama strained, muddled and uncertain about its sympathies. He criticizes Izzard’s miscasting and says the film’s unusual premise slows the story down.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
22 March 2021 · David Rooney
30*

Rooney finds the film watchable but stodgy, with clichéd plotting that undermines its espionage suspense. He praises the Welsh scenery but says attractive production values cannot compensate for shaky storytelling.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 March 2021 · Alissa Simon
30*

Simon finds the film a familiar, second-tier spy thriller with a clunky, meandering plot and stock characters. She singles out the school’s real history as more fascinating than the film’s narrative, though its chilling classroom moments stand out.

Read the full review →
Vulture
24 March 2021 · Helen Shaw
10*

Shaw finds the period thriller weak, underwritten, and illogical, with a distinctly television-like feel. She praises Judi Dench’s finely calibrated performance, which gives her character emotional coherence amid the film’s cardboard figures.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 March 2021 · Anne-Katrin Titze
76*

The critic finds the film’s patchwork approach effective and praises its portrayal of learning, human connection, and innocence lost to hatred. Eddie Izzard’s performance stands out for confidently embodying the character’s many sides.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
65*

The critic finds the film uneven but ultimately worthwhile, with the latter half more compelling than the slow first half. They especially praise Marc Streitenfeld’s score and Judi Dench’s performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate