Critics’ reviews

Something's Gotta Give (2003)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 60: 4 positive, 7 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Something's Gotta Give

60
Positive
4
Mixed
7
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards qualified enjoyment, with praise concentrated on Diane Keaton and her comic partnership with Jack Nicholson. Keaton’s warmth, sophistication and emotional range earn approval even from critics who find the film wanting elsewhere. The pair’s chemistry is the main point of agreement: enthusiastic notices find their exchanges lively enough to sustain a familiar romantic comedy, while more reserved critics still enjoy the performances.

The disagreement concerns how much those performances can carry. Several critics find the plotting slack or overextended, particularly in the final act, and some feel the move towards romantic drama costs the film its comic energy. There is also a split over its familiarity: Eye for Film welcomes its avoidance of romantic clichés, while Variety finds it stereotypical and argues that it patronises the women it claims to empower. Responses range from warm recommendation to firm rejection, with qualified assessments predominating.

Total Film
6 February 2004 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the rom-com formulaic but enjoyable, crediting Nancy Meyers with keeping it spiky and engaging. It especially praises the lively comic partnership between Jack Nicholson and Diane Keaton.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Antonia Quirke
75*

Quirke presents the film as a warm tribute to Diane Keaton and her enduring appeal. She singles out Keaton’s amiable presence and Nicholson’s strikingly animalistic performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 December 2003 · Keith Phipps
75*

Phipps finds the romantic comedy a pleasure, though its plot sometimes hangs slack. He especially praises Diane Keaton’s performance and her chemistry with Jack Nicholson.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 February 2004 · Philip French
70*

French finds the romantic comedy likable and a clear improvement on Nancy Meyers's earlier work, though it runs a little long. He especially praises Diane Keaton’s performance, calling her a continuous delight.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
11 December 2003 · Peter Brunette
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its text is unavailable behind a paywall. The critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 December 2003
64*

The page could not be read, so its verdict cannot be established. The supplied text offers no specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The page identifies this as a film review, but the review text is unavailable. No verdict or specific praise or complaint can be established from the available metadata.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Sloan Freer
60

Freer calls it a feel-good romantic comedy and says Nicholson and Keaton show younger performers how it is done. She singles out Keaton’s combination of sophistication and emotional charm.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 December 2003 · ★★/4 · Jeremiah Kipp
50

Kipp finds the romantic comedy initially enjoyable but ultimately overlong and weighed down by generic filmmaking. He praises the chemistry and comic performances of Jack Nicholson and Diane Keaton, while faulting the drawn-out third act.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 December 2003 · Kenneth Turan
45*

Turan finds the film amusing but says its shift into romantic drama drains much of the fun. He praises Nicholson and Keaton’s comic performances, while faulting the convoluted, overextended plot.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
40*

Thomas finds the romantic comedy entertaining but ultimately contrived and too pleased with itself. He praises the stars’ charm, while criticizing the underwritten supporting roles and the drawn-out final act.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 December 2003 · Scott Foundas
25*

Foundas finds the comedy slapdash, stereotypical, and needlessly prolonged, arguing that it panders to the women it claims to empower. He singles out Diane Keaton’s luminous, emotionally complex performance as the film’s saving grace.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 January 2004 · David Haviland
65*

The critic finds the film very enjoyable, though less successful and credible than As Good As It Gets. They praise Nicholson and Keaton’s chemistry and the film’s refreshing avoidance of romantic clichés.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate