Critics’ reviews

Superman II (1980)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 76: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Superman II

76
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Empire
30 March 2007 · Chris Hewitt
85*

The critic calls it one of the most exciting comic-book films and says it earns a place in the classic canon. They praise its physical-effects action and its human, dramatic focus on Superman, Lois and Clark.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 December 1980 · Martin Gold
85*

Gold gives the sequel an enthusiastic verdict, praising its entertaining blend of romance, thrills, comedy and effects. He especially singles out the climactic battle between Superman and the Kryptonians as a visual highlight.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

Ferguson considers it probably the strongest Christopher Reeve Superman film in terms of plot. He praises Richard Lester’s playful direction and the film’s strong supporting cast.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 June 1981 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert finds the film entertaining and an improvement on its predecessor. He singles out its humor and Christopher Reeve’s performance as particular strengths.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 June 1981 · Janet Maslin
70*

The review presents the film as an entertaining follow-up. It singles out the film’s abundance of tricks, though the page text is unavailable to confirm further details.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DP
70*

The review suggests a positive verdict despite the film feeling less grandiose than its predecessor. It praises the combination of the original’s casting and visual style with Richard Lester’s wit.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 July 2009 · Stephen Carty
65*

Carty finds the flawed, divisive sequel still has plenty to offer. He especially praises the chemistry between Reeve and Kidder and the inventive four-way battle.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate