Most critics welcome Tim Burton’s adaptation as a forceful match between his Gothic style and Sondheim’s grim musical. Praise clusters around the muted London settings, the contrast between monochrome design and bright blood, and the intensity of Depp and Bonham Carter’s performances. The songs generally earn approval for carrying the story forward, while the mixture of black comedy, cruelty and sorrow strikes many reviewers as well judged. Several admire its resistance to sentimental comfort.
The spread runs from wholehearted enthusiasm to qualified approval, with no outright negative reviews. The chief disagreements concern the singing and how much feeling survives the visual treatment. The AV Club finds the leads’ voices inadequate for the score, despite enjoying the humour of “A Little Priest”. Time Out points to thin character psychology and a flat middle section. The Guardian finds the proceedings oddly tasteful and unscary, arguing that the digital London flattens the film.
R
RogerEbert.com
20 December 2007 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100
Ebert praises the film as a dark, faithful adaptation that becomes the bloodiest musical in film history, a revenge tragedy with strong performances and a brooding atmosphere. He singles out the cast's merciless performances and Burton's evocation of 19th-century London poverty for praise.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
21 December 2007 · A.O. Scott
90*
Scott calls the film a dark and terrifying work, as much horror as musical, with a rigorously pessimistic view of human nature that makes it close to a masterpiece of extreme genius. He singles out its bracing refusal of sentimental consolation and willingness to push the story's dreadful implications to their blackest conclusions for praise.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
88*
Burton has made a perfect, just-about-perfect film with Sweeney Todd, a blood-soaked spectacular that hurtles along with momentum and fuses the personal and political into a blazing whole. The critic singles out the intense performances from Depp and Bonham Carter that make it impossible not to connect with the killer and his accomplice, along with Burton's treatment of the material.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
18 December 2008 · ★★★½/4 · Robert Keser
88
Burton draws the material into a black comedy and still blacker tragedy surging with jugular urgency that haunts the mind for days; Depp’s commanding performance and the atmospheric evocation help elevate revenge to tragedy. The film enlarges the work while displaying its dark convictions, though its graphic violence is not for the squeamish.
Read the full review →E
Empire
29 December 2007 · Kim Newman
87*
This is a rich, demented experience that is somehow not a downer, with everyone getting what they deserve in a magnificent death. The critic singles out the daring adaptation (songs trimmed, sub-plots pruned), the stars' fair fists at singing and acting that put over Sondheim’s lyrics, and Burton’s arterial spray and gruesome touches.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
27 January 2008
81*
Tim Burton's musical is rollicking good fun despite copious blood and guts, a strangely moral tale where the innocent prevail and the wicked are punished. The critic singles out the staging, which honours Sondheim's songs and ironies while resembling engravings in a penny dreadful, and the performances of Depp and Bonham Carter.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jamie Russell
80
The critic praises Burton’s distinctive Gothic stamp on the dark musical, highlighting the detailed monochrome production design that contrasts with the blood, and the committed performances by Depp and Bonham Carter despite their lack of vocal training.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
4 January 2008
80*
The piece highlights how Burton’s sensibilities perfectly suit the grisly Grand Guignol musical about murder and revenge, calling it the high point of his collaboration with Johnny Depp and noting its awards potential despite the bloodletting.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
25 January 2008 · Peter Bradshaw
74*
Bradshaw finds the film likable but no masterpiece, noting its entertaining but unscary digital ride through a CGI Victorian London accompanied by classy music. He singles out the muted and oddly tasteful proceedings and the flattening effect of the CGI for complaint.
Read the full review →The film isn’t as potent as it should be; Depp has the right look but neither he nor Bonham Carter has a strong enough voice for Sondheim’s pop-operatic style. Burton’s gothic horror elements and the score’s core hold firm, with the showstopper “A Little Priest” remaining stirring and funny.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
22 January 2008 · ★★★ · Dave Calhoun
60
The critic finds Tim Burton’s adaptation of the Sondheim musical bloodier and more theatrical than typical musicals, with strong visual style and production values, but notes weaknesses in character psychology and a flat middle section.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
20 December 2007 · Paul W. Smith
91*
The critic finds it a long-awaited return to form for Tim Burton in a bloodthirsty tale of barbers, pies and revenge. Depp and Bonham Carter are singled out as the perfect macabre couple, with Depp's Todd a tragic Shakespearean hero; the film is praised as the most satisfying stage-to-screen musical adaptation in years and Burton's most disturbingly delightful to date.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
22 January 2008 · Ben Rawson-Jones
91*
The critic calls it a magnificently realised musical with the right blend of emotional pathos, stunning visuals and accessible songs, a unique masterpiece and an absorbing, sad tale. The songs are singled out for seamlessly propelling the narrative rather than halting it, and the translation from stage to screen is praised as hard to imagine being done any better.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
22 January 2008 · Jennie Kermode
91*
The critic praises the film as one of the year's finest, calling Johnny Depp's performance one of the greatest of his career and noting the dazzling, thrilling gothic tale with no room for redemption. They single out Tim Burton's technical achievement and the grimly muted yet exquisitely shot visuals of squalid 19th-century London.
Read the full review →The piece positions the film as a standout in Burton's post-millennium output, highlighting its operatic melancholy and fully realized R-rated cruelty as elements where the director seems at home, in contrast to later weaker work. It describes the adaptation as deluxe.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
25 August 2022 · Allison Shoemaker
70*
The critic presents the film as peak Burton visually and tonally, with strong costumes and design that suit its operatic emotional scope as an adaptation of a great American musical. It notes the film is essentially an opera with epic inner lives of characters, making it a good fit for Burton's grandiose style.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate