Critics’ reviews

Sweet Smell of Success (1957)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 73: 5 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Sweet Smell of Success

73
Positive
5
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean favourable, with praise clustering around the sharp dialogue, Lancaster and Curtis’s performances, and the evocation of New York after dark. Admirers find the film’s account of media power both thrilling and sharply observed, with the acting giving its vicious exchanges conviction. James Wong Howe’s black-and-white photography draws particular attention, while the jazz score also earns praise for its contribution to the nocturnal atmosphere.

The spread is wide, though the available reservations are less numerous than the scores alone suggest: three entries lack enough review text to establish a specific position. Variety finds the drama compelling but questions the clarity of the columnist’s devotion to his sister. The New York Times supplies the strongest dissent, objecting to the cynical, sordid outlook and the portrayal of power and ambition as relentlessly corrupting. The central divide concerns the darkness that admirers find bracing and the dissenting review finds objectionable.

Empire
1 January 2015 · Colin Kennedy
95*

Kennedy regards the film as a cast-iron classic and one of Hollywood’s darkest works. He singles out its sharp dialogue, standout performances, and richly detailed photography and jazz score.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
23 February 2011 · A · Noel Murray
95

Murray praises the film as an unusually thrilling, sharply observed portrait of media power. He singles out Lancaster and Curtis’s performances, along with the biting dialogue and James Wong Howe’s vivid city photography.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 September 2001 · Philip French
95*

French considers the film a masterpiece and an example of intelligent Hollywood cinema at its best. He particularly praises the crackling dialogue, alongside the performances and the film’s vivid vision of New York nightlife.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 February 2011 · ★★★★½ · Glenn Heath Jr.
90

The critic calls the film a virtuosic, intoxicating portrait of American power lust and praises Criterion’s essential Blu-ray release. He singles out James Wong Howe’s textured black-and-white cinematography and the transfer’s detail.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

The critic regards it as a bracing, still-great drama, though it was too dark for its time. He especially praises Lancaster and Curtis’s risky, vicious performances and the film’s nocturnal photography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CA
65*

The page is identified as a review, but the critic’s verdict is not visible. The available description notes Mackendrick’s association with British humour, but reveals no specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1956 · Variety Staff
65*

The review finds the film a compelling, no-holds-barred account, though it questions the clarity of the columnist’s devotion to his sister. It praises Burt Lancaster’s cunning performance and the production’s evocation of Broadway after dark.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so its critical verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied content.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
6 July 1957 · John McCarten
64*

The issue listing identifies a John McCarten review of the film, but the review text is not available here. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 June 1957 · Bosley Crowther
20*

Crowther’s verdict was strongly negative, finding the film’s outlook cynical and sordid. He objected to its portrayal of power and ambition as relentlessly corrupting.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate