Critics’ reviews

The Abyss (1989)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 52: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of The Abyss

52
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
4

The reviews are divided on The Abyss, but praise consistently gathers around its underwater photography, practical effects and claustrophobic suspense. Even several detractors admire the technical work and the grip of the early action. The central relationship also earns support, with Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio singled out for strong performances. The Guardian places the romance above the spectacle, treating the film’s emotional generosity as a strength.

The main disagreement is over how much that craft compensates for a crowded plot and an increasingly sentimental later stretch. Several favourable reviews acknowledge problems with the ending, while the harsher assessments find the dialogue, characterisation and cosmic themes difficult to tolerate. Time Out rejects the performances and dialogue that other reviews praise. Different cuts also complicate the picture: The Independent finds that the special edition’s additions worsen the sentimentality. The spread is wide, despite substantial agreement about what works underwater.

The Guardian
9 August 2019
80*

The critic views The Abyss as a technically ambitious sci-fi epic that underperformed on release but has gained appreciation through later cuts, highlighting its big-hearted story of human-alien contact. They single out the central romantic relationship between the leads as the film's strongest element, forged under gruelling production conditions.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
70*

The critic praises the film's tension, claustrophobia, special effects and action for most of its runtime but criticizes the soppy, optimistic ending that undermines Cameron's usual style. The first two hours deliver top-notch entertainment.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 November 2014 · THR Staff (original by Duane Byrge)
70*

The critic calls the film colossally ambitious and a visual tour de force with the greatest underwater sequences ever seen, praising its technical brilliance and controlled direction while noting the plot's many elements and a potentially numbing ending for some viewers.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1988 · Variety Staff
50*

The review calls it a firstrate underwater suspenser with an otherworldly twist that suffers from a payoff unworthy of its buildup, as the aliens turn out friendly and the action gets soggy. Strong performances by Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio stand out alongside the elaborate technical achievements.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
14 August 2014 · Tim Peters
45*

The critic finds the plot convoluted and over-the-top with too many elements forced in, complaining it lacks minimalism or irony, while noting that the money shots and visual effects have held up well over time.

Read the full review →
The Independent
20 May 1993 · Kevin Jackson
40*

The critic praises the tension, action and wit in the first part of the special edition but criticizes the added footage for worsening the cosmic and sentimental elements, leading to bathos. The early sections grip but the later additions undermine the film.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 August 1989 · Sheila Benson
30*

The critic finds the film a sweet but numskull hardware-cluttered story that leaves viewers euphoric despite its flaws, praising the glowing underwater effects and one jaw-dropping gimmick while calling the climax embarrassing. It is ultimately a 17-year-old’s vision lacking irony, with technical achievements that cannot fully compensate for its sappy payoff.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 August 1989 · Janet Maslin
30*

The critic describes the film as an overwrought but spectacularly silly adventure about marriage, death, nuclear war and alien life forms that ultimately feels like E.T. underwater. Cameron offsets pretentious themes with luminous underwater photography and extraordinary special effects, though the convoluted plot undercuts its impact compared to his earlier focused action films.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 July 2014 · GA
30*

The critic finds that after a gripping start the film rapidly descends into cliché, absurdity and hyperbole, scuppered by dire dialogue, histrionic performances and maudlin sentimentality.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
4 February 2015 · Michael Reed
70*

The critic views The Abyss as a flawed but ultimately great film and one of Cameron's most personal and revolutionary works, praising its groundbreaking effects, intense underwater sequences, strong performances, and blend of sci-fi, action, and human drama. They single out the impressive practical effects and the director's uncompromising approach while noting problems with the ending, pacing, and some character archetypes.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 December 2008 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic praises the sustained tension, brisk action, sharp dialogue, and high production values in this underwater sci-fi thriller. They note that the extraterrestrial elements may strain credibility at times but the claustrophobic setting and overall execution make it effective.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate