The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

The critic calls the film a major success that creates its own mythology and future. He praises Webb’s grounded, fluid action and Andrew Garfield’s sympathetic performance, while noting some stale story elements and an underwritten female role.

Time Out gives the film a positive four-star review. The available page metadata does not reveal what the critic specifically praises or criticizes.

Harley finds the reboot bumpy but ultimately stylish and engaging enough to earn a sequel. He praises Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone’s chemistry, as well as the visceral action set-pieces.

Mintzer finds the reboot satisfying, with a darker take on Spider-Man balanced by humor and a convincing origin story. He especially praises the witty, realistic chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone, while noting that the 3D feels unnecessary.

Bradshaw finds the reboot potent and entertaining, with Andrew Garfield convincing as Spider-Man and the story more emotionally literate. He particularly praises Rhys Ifans as a compelling, sympathetic adversary.

The critic finds it an entertaining, emotionally involving reboot that favors character drama over nonstop action. He praises the chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone, while finding the Lizard less compelling than the human story.

Edelstein finds the reboot unnecessary but surprisingly good and fresher than the previous series’ third film. He particularly praises Emma Stone’s intelligence and screen presence, which he says makes the romance sparkle.

Freer finds the reboot enjoyable and fresh, though uneven and less spectacular than its predecessor. He especially praises the believable central relationship and the performances of Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone.

The review’s verdict cannot be determined because the page is blocked. Its specific praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

The page identifies this as a review, but the critic’s verdict is unavailable in the accessible text. No specific praise or complaint can be determined from the page shown.

The review finds the film a hasty re-spin that covers familiar ground. It praises Andrew Garfield’s moodier take on Peter Parker, though it says he can seem smug.

Dargis finds the reboot enjoyable but largely unnecessary. She singles out Andrew Garfield’s performance as a bright spot.

Klein finds the film entertaining but ultimately superfluous, especially for viewers familiar with Raimi’s trilogy. He praises the more compelling romantic chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone, while criticizing the familiar action and story.

The critic finds the film occasionally charming but ultimately too heavy and lacking in stakes. Garfield’s helpless, newly powered Peter Parker is singled out as entertaining, while the film’s ponderousness draws complaint.

The review finds the reboot slow and overly angsty, with limited appeal for adults. It praises Andrew Garfield’s performance as gawky and nervous yet appealing.

The critic finds the film entertaining and a more satisfying Spider-Man adaptation, despite pacing problems and a weak villain. They especially praise Andrew Garfield’s Peter Parker as sharp, funny, and true to the character.

The critic finds the reboot thrilling and well handled despite questioning whether another Spider-Man film was needed so soon. The spectacular Manhattan-swinging sequences stand out, while some action feels overly choreographed.

Han finds the reboot good but not compelling enough to justify retelling Spider-Man’s origin so soon. She praises Andrew Garfield’s performance and the film’s heartfelt character relationships, while faulting its familiar superhero plot and unimpressive action.

Carty finds the reboot worthwhile despite its familiar story, weak villain, and frustrating plot issues. He especially praises Andrew Garfield’s performance as a convincing, definitive Peter Parker.

The critic finds the film entertaining but less memorable and emotionally effective than Sam Raimi’s original. They praise the lively rapport between Garfield and Stone, while faulting the weaker emotional punch.

The review finds the reboot adequate but too repetitive to establish its own identity, while recommending it. It praises Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone, whose performances and chemistry make a sequel appealing.

Burgin argues that the reboot is an inferior paraphrase of the earlier Spider-Man films and is also weakened by contrived plot developments. He praises Andrew Garfield as the film’s strongest asset, finding him more convincing as an angsty teenager than Tobey Maguire.

Brew finds the reboot disappointing, overly cautious, and lacking excitement. He praises Andrew Garfield’s performance and the scenes focused on Peter Parker’s relationships, especially with Gwen Stacy and Uncle Ben.