Critics’ reviews

The Big Red One (1980)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 84: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Big Red One

84
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Slant Magazine
28 September 2004 · ★★★★/4 · Nick Schager
100

Schager praises Fuller’s unsentimental, episodic portrayal of war as absurd, cruel, and inescapable. He singles out the film’s visceral combat sequences and its compassionate focus on soldiers and children caught in the violence.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1979 · Variety Staff
90*

The critic calls it a terrific, powerfully intimate war story that also achieves great scope. They praise its fast-paced telling of the European land war through the eyes of five foot soldiers.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
88*

Errigo gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it a great and unusually immediate war film. She singles out Fuller’s intimate, unsentimental depiction of combat and the soldiers’ lived experience.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 January 2005 · Kevin Crust
85*

Crust finds the restored cut elevates the film into a compelling epic. He especially praises Lee Marvin’s performance and the film’s tense, carefully staged action.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
· Roger Ebert
85*

Ebert’s Great Movies feature treats the film as a powerful, unsentimental account of war. It especially values Fuller’s humane perspective on the soldiers’ experiences.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 April 2005 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

Bradshaw argues that the film’s brash, expressionistic vision makes a strong case for its status as a crazy masterpiece. He praises its superbly contrived images and ingenuous passion for conveying the madness of war.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Marriott
80

Marriott considers the film a powerful return to form and one of Fuller's most accomplished features. He praises its poetic, graphic account of combat, anchored by Lee Marvin's performance as the sergeant.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
2 October 2004 · A.O. Scott
75*

The critic views the film as a powerful, unsentimental account of war. He singles out its focus on survival rather than glory.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TR
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the available content.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate