Critics’ reviews

The Blue Angel (1930)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 72: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Blue Angel

72
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond positively to The Blue Angel, with praise centred on Dietrich’s cabaret presence and the performances that make its story of destructive desire compelling. The reviews repeatedly find subtlety beneath Dietrich’s seductive manner, noting cruelty, playfulness and energy in her portrayal of Lola. Jannings also draws substantial admiration for his awkward authority and pathos. Praise extends to the sound’s contrast between stage fantasy and backstage reality, and to the film’s increasingly bleak mood.

The reservations concern pacing, emotional overstatement and how fairly the drama treats its characters. Views on Jannings differ: Radio Times finds him uneven, while The New Yorker particularly admires his observation of an awkward authority figure. Slant Magazine offers the clearest dissent, finding the gender and ideological conflicts somewhat rigged even while praising Jannings. The spread runs from strong enthusiasm to qualified interest, with no review wholly dismissive.

The Guardian
30 May 2019 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw calls the film a fierce, enduring masterpiece of erotic obsession. He singles out Dietrich’s mesmeric performance and the film’s sharp connection between destructive desire and economic insecurity.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Robyn Karney
80

The review is positive overall, while noting that Jannings gives an uneven performance. It singles out Dietrich’s cruel, seductive portrayal and her striking cabaret presence for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
75*

Newman regards the film as a compelling melodrama and a showcase for two memorable performances. He especially praises Dietrich’s nuanced portrayal of Lola and Jannings’s grotesque, undignified clown.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
19 December 2012 · Beth Hanna
75*

Hanna presents the film as a masterful, increasingly bleak work, with its final half-hour especially strong. She praises Dietrich’s energetic, subtle performance and highlights how the sound design contrasts stage fantasy with backstage reality.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 December 1930 · John C. Mosher
75*

Mosher praises the film as a first-class achievement that outshines Hollywood’s offerings. He singles out Emil Jannings’s performance for its superbly observed portrayal of an awkward figure in authority.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 February 1991 · MARK CHALON SMITH
70*

The article presents the film as harshly mesmerizing and effective, despite moments of emotional overstatement. It singles out Dietrich’s final image onstage as the one that lingers.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1929 · Variety Staff
70*

The review calls the picture a standout, though it says the heavy story drags and runs too long. It singles out Dietrich’s singing and final song performance, along with Jannings’s characterization.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TR
64*

The available page identifies this as a film review but provides no critical verdict. Its standfirst describes Lola’s seduction and destruction of Professor Rath, without naming a specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 December 2013 · ★★½ · Chuck Bowen
50

Bowen regards the film as a fascinating, strange early sound-film achievement, while finding its gender and ideology conflicts somewhat rigged. He singles out Emil Jannings’s haunting, pathos-filled performance as the film’s most compelling element.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 October 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
75*

The critic calls the film a classic moral tragedy, with the professor’s infatuation leading to his downfall. He praises Jannings’s performance and singles out Dietrich’s playful, seemingly innocent portrayal of Lola.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate