Critics’ reviews

The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 38: 3 positive, 1 mixed, 12 negative.

Back to our review of The Day the Earth Stood Still

38
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
12

Most critics find The Day the Earth Stood Still a sluggish remake that does too little to justify revisiting the original. The main complaints concern thin characters, a heavy-handed environmental message and spectacle that displaces ideas without supplying much excitement. Praise is scattered rather than shared: several reviews find Keanu Reeves well suited to the detached alien Klaatu, while some credit the effects with providing serviceable action. Even sympathetic accounts acknowledge that the film simplifies its message.

The spread is wide, although negative reviews clearly dominate. Empire finds a relevant, tense thriller, and Paste sees a sincere, reasonably coherent update for blockbuster audiences. Reeves is a particular dividing point: The Guardian regards his performance as torpid, while several warmer reviews make him the chief attraction. The effects divide critics too, drawing appreciation for their spectacle from some and complaints about their quality or emotional emptiness from others.

Empire
11 December 2008 · Helen O'Hara
70*

The remake closely follows the spirit of the 1951 original while updating the threat to environmental catastrophe. It succeeds as a relevant, tense thriller with a strong central performance from Keanu Reeves.

Read the full review →
The Times
11 December 2008 · James Christopher
70*

The critic finds it entertaining tongue-in-cheek tosh with strong effects and a hypnotic Reeves performance, though the message could have been delivered more simply.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
12 December 2008 · C+ · Tasha Robinson
63

The remake thoughtfully explores sorrow over a suicidal race for part of its runtime but lacks the courage of its convictions and is irritatingly broad about why humanity might need to die. It prioritizes special effects and military details over meaningful contemporary relevance or emotional stakes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Jamie Russell
40

The critic calls it a fatuous and pointless remake that ditches the original's subtext and suffers in comparison, though passable on its own terms with good CGI action.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 December 2008
40*

A sluggish reboot that merges action and family drama unsuccessfully, with overdone seriousness and only Reeves somewhat effective as the alien.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 December 2008 · A.O. Scott
40*

The remake invites viewers to feel fleetingly bad about humanity's fate while encouraging them to laugh it off as camp, turning the fear of apocalypse into something more palatable. Any hope that the film might rise above its pulpy silliness rests mainly on Keanu Reeves' performance as the weary extraterrestrial Klaatu.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 December 2008 · Nick Schager
30*

The inert remake misses opportunities and feels limp and perfunctory in its environmental update to the original premise. Wooden archetypes and amateurish effects fail to make a compelling case, though the tossed-off moral minimizes preaching compared to the predecessor.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 December 2008 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

The critic calls the film a stupendously dull remake of the 1951 classic, with Keanu Reeves giving a torpid performance as the alien Klaatu.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
11 December 2008
30*

The critic finds the remake tired and corny despite the efforts of its stars. It updates the story with a green theme but delivers the message in a gimmicky, dated way that falls far short of the original in ideas and issues.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 December 2008 · David Jenkins
20*

This daft and pointless sci-fi remake has very little to recommend it, being tonally confused, poorly cast (especially Reeves), and missing the original's spectacle and message.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 December 2008 · Todd McCarthy
20*

This botched remake seriously dishonors the fine 1951 original by failing to justify the reworking with any deep thought, as the premise now feels overly familiar. The film lacks primal defining imagery and sticks to dull, uninteresting versions of the source material's characters and plot points.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
10 December 2008 · Nigel Andrews
10*

The remake is as dull as ditchwater with nothing new to add; Reeves has the charisma of a speak-your-weight machine and Derrickson directs without inspiration.

Read the full review →
Paste
12 December 2008 · Jeffrey Bloomer
70*

The critic views the remake as a sincere, reasonably coherent attempt to update the classic for modern blockbuster audiences, praising Keanu Reeves' fitting performance as the alien Klaatu while noting it prioritizes effects over the original's ideas.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
12 December 2008 · Stella Papamichael
30*

The critic criticizes Keanu Reeves' wooden performance and the film's lack of emotional depth or character development, calling out clichéd plotting, soulless CGI effects, and failure to match the original's sophistication or relevance.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
14 December 2008 · Angus Wolfe Murray
30*

The critic finds the remake a dull, humorless travesty with little action beyond CGI flashes and unengaging performances, especially from Keanu Reeves as an emotionless Klaatu. It praises the basic concept of saving Earth from humanity but criticizes the execution as a lifeless script weighed down by seriousness.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
14 December 2008 · ★ · Ron Hogan
20

The critic pans the remake for stripping out the original's strengths, replacing them with poor CGI, unexciting chases, and a heavy-handed environmental message; praises John Cleese's small role as the lone bright spot.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate