Critics’ reviews

The Earrings of Madame de... (1953)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 73: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Earrings of Madame de...

73
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to The Earrings of Madame de…, with praise clustering around Ophüls’s fluid camerawork and his treatment of love under social constraint. The expressive tracking shots and choreographed ballroom sequence draw particular admiration, while several reviews find that the elegant surfaces allow a searching examination of gender and romantic conventions. Performances also attract praise, especially the expressive glances of Darrieux and De Sica, alongside the film’s handling of passion and circumstance.

The spread is wide, however, with two firmly negative assessments challenging the emotional substance that its admirers find. Variety praises the careful framing and restrained acting but considers the attitudes dated and the characters lifeless. Eye for Film likewise acknowledges the visual beauty, yet finds the drama superficial and unconvincing, with the earrings’ repeated returns becoming an irritatingly predictable device. The central disagreement is whether the elegance deepens the characters’ feelings or leaves them insufficiently explored.

The Guardian
14 February 2013 · Peter Bradshaw
95*

Bradshaw calls the film a great, praising its elegant, gripping storytelling and erotic mystery. He especially singles out its fluid camerawork and superb trio of performances.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
7 August 2013 · Matt Brennan
90*

Brennan offers a strongly positive appraisal, calling the film a masterpiece whose insights remain striking. He singles out Ophuls’ graceful, fluid visual style and the way it uses surface elegance to examine gender and romantic conventions.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 March 2007 · Dave Kehr
90*

Kehr’s review is strongly positive about Ophüls’s film. It singles out the director’s elegant, fluid visual style for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
12 February 2013 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

Huddleston gives the film a positive four-star assessment. He singles out its distinctive structure, which shifts from sunny aristocratic comedy toward darker drama.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 August 2013 · ★★★½ · Chuck Bowen
70

Bowen finds the film’s view of love and social convention unusually nuanced, while judging the Criterion release not quite stellar. He praises the vibrant mono soundtrack and Ophüls’s expressive tracking shots, but criticizes the transfer’s lack of detail and overly scrubbed skin textures.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
15 October 2008 · Noel Murray
70*

Murray presents the film positively as the culmination of themes developed in Ophüls’ earlier work. He singles out its style, tone, and music for capturing characters who feel independent but are swept along by passion and circumstance.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1952 · Variety Staff
40*

The review finds the film delicately made but weighed down by dated attitudes and lifeless characters. It praises Ophüls’s careful photographic framing and the cast’s restrained performances.

Read the full review →
Paste
10 October 2008 · 84/100 · Andy Beta
84

The critic calls it the collection’s most emotionally resonant film. They single out its choreographed ballroom sequence and the expressive glances of Darrieux and De Sica.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Nicola Osborne
30*

The critic finds the film beautiful but ultimately unconvincing and superficial. She singles out the earrings’ increasingly predictable returns as an infuriating plot device.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate