Critics’ reviews

The Eight Hundred (2020)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 59: 3 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Eight Hundred

59
Positive
3
Mixed
3
Negative
2

The reviews are divided, with praise clustering around the scale and staging of the combat rather than the soldiers themselves. Several critics find the battle sequences gripping, brutal and clearly organised, even when the wider story feels crowded. The shifts between large-scale action and quieter passages earn approval, as does the cinematography. The more favourable reviews find enough force in the warehouse siege to carry its sprawling cast and political detours.

The main reservations concern thin characterisation, uneven pacing and nationalism, with verdicts ranging from enthusiastic to strongly negative. Variety finds the film emotionally compelling despite its crowded storytelling, while other reviews describe spectacle that offers too little character depth. The Los Angeles Times objects particularly to the nationalism and treatment of martyrdom, while acknowledging the appeal of the combat spectacle. The disagreement is substantial: technical accomplishment draws fairly broad respect, but emotional impact and political emphasis divide the critics.

Variety
26 August 2020 · Critics Pick · Maggie Lee
85*

Lee finds the war epic imposing and emotionally compelling, though its sprawling cast and political detours sometimes weigh it down. She praises the propulsive opening battle sequence for conveying the rookies’ disorientation and the brutality of combat.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jamie Healy
80

Healy gives the film a positive four-star verdict. He singles out its epic siege premise, with Chinese soldiers defending a warehouse against successive attacks.

Read the full review →
Empire
18 September 2020 · Ian Freer
75*

Freer finds the film sprawling and overstuffed, but consistently gripping. He praises its epic scale and its skillful shifts between spectacular action and quieter moments.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
18 September 2020 · John Berra
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is not visible in the accessible text. No specific praise or complaint can be determined from the available content.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 September 2020 · Cath Clarke
60*

Clarke finds the war epic thrilling but emotionally thin. She praises its breathtaking, thunderous battle scenes while faulting the lack of character depth and the assaultive score.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
31 August 2020 · Elizabeth Kerr
50*

Kerr finds the war epic technically impressive but ultimately short of glory. She praises its clear, gruesome battle sequences and striking cinematography, while faulting its thin characterization and rote war-film clichés.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 September 2020 · Michael Ordoña
30*

Ordoña finds the film’s nationalism and fetishized martyrdom troubling, while acknowledging its appeal as a large-scale war spectacle. He criticizes its thinly developed characters and meandering pacing.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
17 September 2020 · BFI
30*

The review finds the film bombastic and resolutely neo-nationalist, though it acknowledges some surprises in its character focus. It praises the staging of how people across the river shift from curiosity to support, while criticizing the subtitles’ anachronistic slang.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate