The reviews are divided, with praise clustering around the scale and staging of the combat rather than the soldiers themselves. Several critics find the battle sequences gripping, brutal and clearly organised, even when the wider story feels crowded. The shifts between large-scale action and quieter passages earn approval, as does the cinematography. The more favourable reviews find enough force in the warehouse siege to carry its sprawling cast and political detours.
The main reservations concern thin characterisation, uneven pacing and nationalism, with verdicts ranging from enthusiastic to strongly negative. Variety finds the film emotionally compelling despite its crowded storytelling, while other reviews describe spectacle that offers too little character depth. The Los Angeles Times objects particularly to the nationalism and treatment of martyrdom, while acknowledging the appeal of the combat spectacle. The disagreement is substantial: technical accomplishment draws fairly broad respect, but emotional impact and political emphasis divide the critics.
