Critics’ reviews

The Emerald Forest (1985)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 69: 3 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Emerald Forest

69
Positive
3
Mixed
5
Negative
0

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around the jungle photography and visual storytelling. Critics repeatedly single out the use of light, colour and movement, while the more enthusiastic accounts also admire the music and ritual detail. The adventure holds attention even for some who find the writing uneven. Praise for the performances is less consistent, though Powers Boothe receives favourable notice from Empire.

The spread runs from strong enthusiasm to mixed assessments, with no outright negative verdicts. Reservations centre on clunky plotting, thin characterisation and an environmental message that some find overly earnest or preachy. Slant Magazine offers a contrasting reading, finding thematic depth beyond a straightforward conservation plea. Charley Boorman particularly divides opinion: Radio Times finds his acting awkward, while Eye for Film considers him endearing. The latter nevertheless questions the tribal stereotyping, showing that sympathy for the film’s ecological concerns does not settle doubts about its portrayal of people.

Los Angeles Times
2 July 1985 · Sheila Benson
95*

Benson calls the film a powerful, beautiful surprise and suggests it may become a classic. She praises its vivid portrayal of tribal life, especially the lush cinematography, music, and ritual details.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 June 2010 · Robert C. Cumbow
85*

Cumbow presents the film as a lasting, thematically rich work rather than a simple environmental tract. He praises its vivid use of light, color, and movement to challenge assumptions about civilization and nature.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1984 · Variety Staff
70*

The review finds the film engrossing despite flaws in its narrative and characterization. It particularly praises the film’s visual fascination, while noting tension between documentary realism and stylized direction.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 July 1985 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict cannot be confirmed. No specific praise or complaint is available from the supplied page text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DT
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a film review but provides no critic's verdict. It contains no review text indicating what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
60

Hutchinson finds the film’s conservation message strengthens its appeal, despite an overly earnest approach. He praises Philippe Rousselot’s beautiful jungle photography but criticizes Charley Boorman’s awkward acting.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
55*

Nathan finds the film visually striking and effective as an adventure, but feels its environmental message can become preachy. He praises Powers Boothe’s performance while criticizing the film’s self-righteousness and cloying reunion.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
28 March 2005 · Andrea Mullaney
60*

Mullaney finds the film uneven but ultimately warm-hearted, with an ecological message that remains relevant. She praises Charley Boorman’s endearing performance, while criticizing the clunky plot and the tribe’s “noble savage” stereotyping.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate