Critics’ reviews

The Fast and the Furious (2001)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 60: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Fast and the Furious

60
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics find The Fast and the Furious entertaining despite its script, with praise concentrated on the car chases, practical stunts and customised cars. The favourable reviews value its energy and unpretentious approach to action, accepting the silliness as part of the appeal. Several find that the driving sequences supply enough excitement to compensate for weaknesses elsewhere. Radio Times also singles out Vin Diesel’s screen presence.

The divide is wide, with enthusiastic approval at one end and outright rejection at the other. Even supportive reviews acknowledge muddled writing, but the strongest objections concern the spectacle itself rather than just the plot. The Guardian finds the racing deafening and self-congratulatory, with relentless engine noise a particular irritation. Eye for Film dismisses the film as a shallow commercial, objecting to its incoherent plotting and fixation on cars and male bodies. What most critics enjoy, these dissenters find grating or empty.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
90*

The critic finds the film deliriously entertaining despite its deliberately silly tone. The high-speed car chases and seamless mix of stunts and CGI stand out for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones praises the film as a high-energy action thriller that successfully launched a franchise. He singles out its customised cars, turbo-charged stunts and Vin Diesel’s screen presence.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · The Standard
70*

The critic finds the film entertaining despite its less-than-smart script. The near-unbelievable practical stunts are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
22 June 2016 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

Honeycutt finds the film an energetic, character-driven hit, despite a messy script and an implausible ending. He especially praises the heart-stopping stunts and Southern California location work.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
70*

The review presents the film as enjoyable, unpretentious drive-in entertainment. It praises the way the teen hot-rod flick recalls the thrills of Roger Corman’s B-movies.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 June 2001
64*

The accessible page does not expose the critic's verdict. It provides no praise or complaint to summarize.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 September 2001 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

Bradshaw gives the film a sharply negative verdict, finding its car-racing spectacle deafening and self-congratulatory. He singles out the relentless engine noise as the film’s most grating feature.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 September 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
15*

The critic dismisses the film as a shallow, testosterone-driven commercial with an incoherent plot. He singles out its fetishistic focus on cars and male bodies, while finding the earlier street-gang films more seductive.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate