Critics’ reviews

The Firm (1993)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 66: 4 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Firm

66
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics find The Firm an absorbing, polished thriller, and the praise clusters around Sydney Pollack’s assured direction and the cast. Gene Hackman is singled out more than anyone, with Tom Cruise close behind, and several reviews point to the supporting performances as the film’s chief strength. The detail of life inside the law firm is noted as one of the things that keeps it watchable across a long running time.

The reservations are about length and weight. Even admirers call it overlong and the story slow to unfold, and Empire finds it overindulgent and forgettable despite working as pulpy entertainment. The sharpest dissent comes from Time Out, which faults Pollack for softening the novel’s conspiracy paranoia and reducing the Mob to ordinary goons. The spread is fairly wide, from warm approval to outright disappointment, though most land on the approving side.

Los Angeles Times
30 June 1993 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan praises the film as a polished, exciting adaptation that improves on the novel while preserving its appeal. He singles out the exceptional supporting performances and Pollack’s subtle, assured direction.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

Ferguson finds the lavish legal thriller engrossing, despite its sometimes overlong feel. He particularly praises Gene Hackman and Tom Cruise, while noting Hackman’s strong performance.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 June 1993 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert finds the film an engaging thriller, though its story takes time to unfold. He singles out the details of life inside the law firm as a strength.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 June 1993 · Todd McCarthy
75*

McCarthy calls the film an absorbing, old-fashioned crowd-pleaser despite its disposable story. He praises Pollack’s polished direction and the convincing performances, especially those of Tom Cruise and Gene Hackman.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 June 1993 · Janet Maslin
64*

The article body is inaccessible, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified. The URL identifies a review of the 1993 film, but the page provides no review text.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Matt Mueller
50*

Mueller finds the film overindulgent and forgettable, though it still works as pulpy entertainment. He singles out the supporting performances as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· WH
35*

The review is critical of Pollack’s conventional adaptation. It faults the film for softening the novel’s conspiracy-paranoia atmosphere and turning the Mob into ordinary goons.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate