Critics’ reviews

The First Slam Dunk (2022)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 71: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The First Slam Dunk

71
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to The First Slam Dunk, with praise centred on the animation and the clarity, speed and physical force of its basketball sequences. The action gives the characters’ feelings a convincing physical expression, making the match matter beyond the score. Several reviews find the drama affecting despite its familiar sports-story formulas, and admire how the choreography makes a complicated game readable and exciting.

The reservations concern pacing, accessibility and the interruptions to the match. Some critics find the basketball strategy demanding or feel the film assumes prior knowledge; others note repetition and the strain of fitting numerous character stories into one film. The spread is fairly broad, though positive reviews predominate. The Skinny is the clearest dissenter, finding that clashing animation styles and sporadic flashbacks weaken the tension. The AV Club remains favourable but also flags racist tropes.

IndieWire
28 July 2023 · B+ · David Ehrlich
83

Ehrlich calls the film a thrilling, emotionally layered crowd-pleaser. He especially praises how its detailed depiction of basketball turns the game into an expansive source of human drama.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
30 August 2023 · 3/4/4 · Esther Rosenfield
80

Rosenfield finds the film thrilling and calls it a total slam dunk. She particularly praises the clarity and exhilarating choreography of the basketball action.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 August 2023 · ★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
80

The critic praises the film as kinetic, poetic anime. They single out its supercharged basketball drama and motion.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 July 2023 · 7.8 · Jacob Oller
77*

Oller finds the film an ambitious, effective balance of familiar sports-anime storytelling and visual innovation. He especially praises the kinetic animation and heart-stopping finale, while noting that the film can feel repetitive and retains racist tropes.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
31 August 2023 · BFI
75*

The critic finds the film an exhilarating, emotionally grounded sports anime, even though its story relies on familiar formulas. They single out the fluid, tactile animation for capturing the speed and physicality of basketball.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 July 2023 · ★★★/4 · Ross McIndoe
75

McIndoe finds the film exhilarating despite its difficulty fitting the manga’s many stories into two hours. He praises the vivid, inventive animation and the way the basketball game gives characters’ inner lives physical expression.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 July 2023
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the provided text.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 September 2023 · ★★★ · Wendy Ide
60

Ide finds the film dynamic and unexpectedly affecting, while noting that its basketball strategy can feel overcomplicated. She praises its sparse, handsome animation and springy nonlinear structure for refreshing the sports-movie genre.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
1 August 2023 · festival review · Andrew Robertson
70*

Robertson finds the film’s long, difficult pacing ultimately pays off in suspense. He praises the kinetic basketball sequences and inventive animation, while noting that the film assumes familiarity with basketball.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
17 August 2023 · ★★ · Jamie Dunn
40

The review finds the film an uneven blend of heartfelt drama and a meat-headed sports movie. It criticises the jarring animation styles and the sporadic flashbacks, which undermine the match’s tension.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate