Critics’ reviews

The Fountain (2006)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 62: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Fountain

62
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics come down in favour, though not by a wide margin: five positive against two mixed and two negative. Where they praise, they praise the same things. Hugh Jackman’s performance is singled out again and again, usually alongside Rachel Weisz, and the pair are credited with keeping an eccentric story of grief anchored to something human. Clint Mansell’s score draws similar approval, and even the doubters concede the imagery is striking.

The reservations gather around the writing. Several critics find the dialogue clanging or tacky and the philosophy vague, and they part on whether the film’s sincerity makes up for it. The spread is wide. Variety and Time Out dismiss it outright, one as tedious and emotionally unengaging, the other as lacking any insight, while Little White Lies and Eye for Film rank it above anything else Aronofsky has made. It is a film critics either forgive or do not.

Little White Lies
25 January 2007 · 5/5/5 · Matt Bochenski
100

The critic calls the film an unparalleled, emotionally powerful achievement. They single out Hugh Jackman’s performance, supported by Clint Mansell’s score, as anchoring its story of grief.

Read the full review →
Empire
2 January 2007 · Helen O'Hara
85*

O'Hara finds the film moving and thought-provoking despite its deliberate obscurity and occasional clanging dialogue. She especially praises Hugh Jackman's career-best performance and Rachel Weisz's warmth and intelligence, which ground the film's eccentric story.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 January 2007 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the film imperfect but transcendent, praising its ambition and emotional impact. It singles out Jackman and Weisz for giving the intimate love story a moving emotional core.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 November 2006 · ★★★/4 · Nick Schager
75

Schager finds the film uneven and sometimes silly, but ultimately moving and invigorating in its daring sincerity. He praises its visual artistry and Clint Mansell’s elegiac score for deepening the emotional force of its romantic themes.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
4 September 2006 · festival review · Lee Marshall
64*

The review’s verdict is unavailable in the visible page text. The paywall also hides what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 January 2007 · Nicholas Barber
50*

Barber finds the film absorbing but says its ambition is undermined by tacky dialogue, effects and philosophical vagueness. He particularly praises its psychedelic, metaphysical sweep, while criticizing its overlong message about making the most of life.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 January 2007 · David Jenkins
10*

The critic dismisses the film as a turgid, insight-free failure. They complain that its ornate, hippie-dream approach lacks substance.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 September 2006 · festival review · Leslie Felperin
10*

Felperin finds the film incoherent, tedious and emotionally unengaging. She praises its striking visual effects but says the thinly drawn characters and repetitive storytelling undermine them.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 January 2007 · Scott Macdonald
94*

The critic calls the film astonishing, ambitious cinema and regards it as Aronofsky’s masterpiece. They single out its striking imagery and the emotionally convincing performances of Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate