Critics’ reviews

The Gold Rush (1925)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 80: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Gold Rush

80
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Gold Rush, with praise clustering around Chaplin’s physical comedy and his ability to make hunger and loneliness funny without dismissing either. The boot banquet, bread roll dance and teetering cabin recur as examples of carefully worked comic invention. Several reviews find the melancholy just as important as the slapstick, singling out Chaplin’s expressive use of space and the New Year’s Eve sequence for the strength of their feeling.

The differences are chiefly in the degree of enthusiasm, rather than any sustained case against the film. Slant Magazine finds stretches slack but admires the romantic emotion, while Collider’s preference for Keaton and Lloyd does not prevent it finding Chaplin charming, funny and poignant. The accessible verdicts range from appreciative to emphatic praise; two entries lack accessible judgements, so they provide no firm evidence of further reservations.

IndieWire
4 February 2015 · Max O'Connell
95*

O’Connell presents the film as a hilarious, enduring masterpiece that balances comedy with loneliness and longing. He particularly praises Chaplin’s expressive use of space and the emotional force of the New Year’s Eve sequence.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 July 2025 · ANDRÉ DIDYME-DÔME
95*

The critic calls the film a masterful, deeply human work that turns hardship into tender, ingenious comedy. The review singles out the boot banquet and roll dance as memorable scenes blending physical humor with melancholy.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 July 1925 · Variety Staff
95*

The review calls the film a triumph and the greatest comedy ever filmed. It especially praises the comic sequence with Chaplin and Swain in the teetering cabin.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Scott Russon
80*

The review finds the film’s lasting appeal easy to understand. It praises the hungry boot-boiling scene and the bread roll dance as memorable comic moments.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 December 2011 · ★★★/4 · Jaime N. Christley
75

Christley finds the film occasionally slack but ultimately sublime in its grand romantic emotion. He singles out the scene of the Tramp listening alone to “Auld Lang Syne” as a perfect moment.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
1 July 2012 · Richard Brody
75*

Brody offers an appreciative reading of the film and its contrasting 1942 sound version. He singles out Chaplin’s memorable comic set pieces and the later version’s revealing shift in tone.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 April 1942
64*

The article appears to review Chaplin’s re-release of The Gold Rush, but its verdict is unavailable. The page content could not be accessed, so no specific praise or complaint can be identified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the critic’s verdict is not accessible. The available description outlines the plot without singling out any element for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Collider
14 October 2016 · Dave Trumbore
70*

Trumbore finds the film charming and funny, despite preferring Keaton and Lloyd’s humor. He singles out Chaplin’s practiced antics and the poignant New Year’s Eve dream sequence.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate