Critics’ reviews

The Golden Child (1986)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 38: 0 positive, 3 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of The Golden Child

38
Positive
0
Mixed
3
Negative
4

The reviews lean negative, with most critics finding that The Golden Child struggles to make its comedy and fantasy adventure work together. Praise is limited to individual performers rather than the film’s handling of either genre. The Los Angeles Times credits Eddie Murphy’s comic skills and finds brief relief in his scenes with Victor Wong, while Empire singles out Charles Dance as a respectable villain who would suit darker material.

The reservations differ more in emphasis than in severity: some reviews focus on incompatible styles, others on weak jokes and muddled storytelling. Radio Times finds that Murphy’s quick-fire delivery falls flat and faults Michael Ritchie’s direction, whereas Variety objects particularly to the special-effects monsters and the mixture of mysticism and sentimentality. The scores span mixed to strongly negative, but the two highest-scored entries have no accessible verdicts, so they offer no confirmed counterargument to the prevailing disappointment.

The New York Times
12 December 1986 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page does not expose the review text, so its verdict cannot be confirmed. No specific praise or complaint is available from the accessible content.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CPea
64*

The available description presents the film as an attempt to combine martial-arts thrills with a Hollywood comic thriller. The page provides no accessible critic verdict or specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 December 1986 · ★★/4 · Roger Ebert
50

Ebert finds the film an unsuccessful comedy-adventure. The review objects to the mismatch between its fantasy-adventure plot and comedy.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · John Ferguson
40

Ferguson finds the comedy adventure mediocre and says Murphy’s performance cannot save it. He singles out Murphy’s quick-fire quips for falling flat and describes Michael Ritchie’s direction as indifferent.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Gavin Bainbridge
20*

The critic finds the film an unsuccessful mix of incompatible styles and themes. Charles Dance is singled out as a respectable villain, though the critic thinks he would have suited darker material.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 December 1986 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
15*

Wilmington finds the film a flabby disappointment, with jokes that fall flat and action that curdles. He praises Murphy’s comic skills but says the script gives them little to work with, singling out the brief scenes with Victor Wong as an exception.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1985 · Variety Staff
10*

The review pans the film as incoherent and an unsuccessful mixture of disparate elements. It particularly objects to the dragged-in special-effects monsters and the story’s muddled combination of mysticism and sentimentality.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate