Critics’ reviews

The Good, the Bad, the Weird (2008)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 75: 7 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Good, the Bad, the Weird

75
Positive
7
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics enjoy The Good, the Bad, the Weird, and the praise gathers almost entirely around its action. Seven of the ten reviews are positive and none is negative. The set-pieces are what the reviews keep returning to: their energy, their scale and the ironic humour that runs through them. The AV Club singles out the climactic chase between horses and motorcycles, and Empire picks out Song Kang-ho’s performance as the Weird as the film’s most entertaining element. The Hollywood Reporter credits the recreated historical setting with giving the spectacle some grounding.

The reservations cluster on plot and length. Several critics find the story tangled or hard to follow, The Guardian calls the film over-extended, and Empire is let down by the ending. Collider notes that spectacle wins out over emotional depth. The firmest dissent comes from Slant Magazine, which finds the film inert, its action distended and short on tension. The spread is fairly narrow: a few lukewarm verdicts, nothing hostile.

The AV Club
22 April 2010 · B+ · Noel Murray
83

Murray finds the film an entertaining, sprawling action adventure, though its plot can be hard to follow and its appeal is mainly for Western buffs. He praises the inventive action sequences, especially the climactic horse-versus-motorcycle chase and the way each action shapes what follows.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 February 2009 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The four-star rating indicates a positive verdict. The accessible metadata notes Kim Jee-Woon’s success in homegrown genres, but the article text is unavailable to identify a specific point of praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 May 2008 · festival review · Derek Elley
80*

The critic finds the film an exhilarating, distinctly Korean take on the Western. He praises its energetic action setpieces and the ironic humor that keeps them fresh.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 February 2009 · Philip French
75*

French finds the film over-extended but extremely enjoyable, praising its ferocious energy and excess. He singles out its lively blend of Korean western action and influences from Sergio Leone and Indiana Jones.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 June 2008 · festival review · Maggie Lee
75*

Lee finds the film a jaunty, energetic adventure that builds to a spectacular showdown. She singles out its meticulously recreated historical setting for adding cultural depth and authenticity.

Read the full review →
Empire
29 January 2009 · Dan Jolin
65*

Jolin finds the film joyous overall, though its tangled story and underwhelming ending detract from the fun. He singles out Song Kang-ho’s entertaining performance as the Weird.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be verified. No review details are available to summarize reliably.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 April 2010 · ★★½/4 · Simon Abrams
62

Abrams argues that the film’s nihilistic approach leaves it inert and unsatisfying. He finds its genre-mixing conceptually fascinating, but criticizes the distended action and lack of tension.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 October 2008 · Anton Bitel
90*

Bitel finds the film wildly entertaining and praises its energetic blend of western conventions and genre-bending action. He singles out the spectacular, chaotic set-pieces and the film’s lively tonal shifts.

Read the full review →
Collider
23 June 2024 · Namwene Mukabwa
77*

The review finds the film an entertaining, refreshingly modern take on the Western, even if it favors spectacle over emotional depth. It especially praises the kinetic action and the colorful visual style blending Western and Eastern cinema.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate