Critics’ reviews

The Haunting (1963)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 70: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Haunting

70
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics rate The Haunting highly, and the praise clusters around Robert Wise’s decision to keep the horror unseen. Reviewers return to the same devices: the sound design, the disorienting camerawork, and the patience with which suggestion is allowed to do the work a monster would otherwise do. Several single out Julie Harris as Eleanor, whose vulnerability is credited with giving the scares somewhere to land. The positive notices are strongly positive rather than merely approving.

The reservations are about the writing and the pitch. Variety finds the artistry cannot rescue a screenplay that does not follow through on its ideas, while still admiring how the cinematography turns the house into a character. Time Out thinks the performances often overwrought, and Empire, though admiring, concedes the film sometimes strains. The Hollywood Reporter feels it explains its mysteries too readily. The spread is wide, from dismissal to near-unqualified praise, and two of the earliest notices survive only as citations.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The review calls it one of the best supernatural chillers ever made. It praises Robert Wise’s unseen, atmospheric horrors and Julie Harris’s performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 August 2003 · Keith Phipps
85*

Phipps praises the film as an effective, unsettling haunted-house story. He singles out Wise’s use of sound, disorienting camerawork, and unseen threats to sustain its ambiguity.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
82*

The review regards the film as an exceptionally terrifying, highly wrought ghost story, though sometimes overwrought. It especially praises the eerie visual design and sound, which make the unseen threat feel ever-present.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
31 October 2018 · James Powers
75*

Powers finds the film an effective, sophisticated ghost story, though it sometimes overexplains its mysteries. He particularly praises the terror unleashed when the spirits are allowed to overwhelm rational explanation.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 September 1963 · Brendan Gill
65*

The issue identifies Brendan Gill’s “Current Cinema” as reviewing The Haunting, but this page does not expose his verdict. No specific praise or complaint is available in the accessible text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 September 1963 · Bosley Crowther
64*

The archival page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint is available in the supplied text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
40*

The available description suggests a negative assessment, calling the performances often overwrought. It singles out the acting as a weakness, while the full review is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1962 · Variety Staff
35*

The critic finds the film’s artistry unable to overcome a screenplay that fails to follow through on its ideas. The striking cinematography, which makes the house feel like a character, is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Paste
5 September 2019 · Jim Vorel
90*

Vorel calls the film an exceptionally effective and enduring chiller, praising its patient use of suggestion to build tension. He also singles out Julie Harris’s vulnerable, emotionally affecting performance as Eleanor.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate