Critics’ reviews

The Highwaymen (2019)

22 reviews from 22 publications. Critics’ score 53: 4 positive, 10 mixed, 8 negative.

Back to our review of The Highwaymen

53
Positive
4
Mixed
10
Negative
8

The consensus on The Highwaymen is mixed, with praise concentrated on Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson rather than the pursuit around them. Across favourable and unfavourable reviews, their weary rapport, irritable exchanges and contrasting performances give the film much of its appeal. Some critics also admire the expansive landscapes and period detail, though the leads are the more consistent source of enthusiasm.

The main divide concerns whether this lawmen-centred retelling offers a useful correction to the romanticising of Bonnie and Clyde or merely replaces it with another selective account. The Los Angeles Times welcomes a sober, effective counterpoint; The Guardian regards it as an unconvincing defence of police brutality and reactionary masculinity. Between those poles, reservations cluster around sluggish pacing, familiar procedure and underdeveloped moral questions. The spread is wide, but complaints about a lack of urgency recur even among critics who enjoy the central partnership.

Los Angeles Times
14 March 2019 · Michael Ordoña
85*

Ordoña finds the film a sober, effective counterpoint to the romanticized Bonnie and Clyde story. He especially praises Kevin Costner’s grounded performance and the actors’ ability to convey the lawmen’s shared history without clichés.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

Collins gives the film four stars, presenting it as a retelling of the Bonnie and Clyde story from the lawmen’s perspective. The supplied excerpt singles out the focus on the two retired Texas Rangers.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 March 2019 · B- · Eric Kohn
70

Kohn finds the film a sturdy, well-acted but overly familiar procedural that falls short of making its case against the classic Bonnie and Clyde story. He praises the chemistry between Costner and Harrelson and the cinematography’s expansive golden landscapes.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 March 2019 · festival review · Joe Leydon
70*

Leydon finds the film workmanlike but engaging, chiefly as a showcase for its well-matched leads. He praises Costner and Harrelson’s chemistry and world-weary performances, while noting that few scenes are conventionally exciting.

Read the full review →
Empire
26 March 2019 · Ian Freer
65*

Freer finds the film enjoyable but leisurely, with too little excitement or urgency. He singles out the chemistry between Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked by a browser check, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint from the review is available in the provided text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 March 2019 · Tim Grierson
64*

The available page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also does not show what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 March 2019
64*

The page content is unavailable, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Vulture
28 March 2019 · Bilge Ebiri
60*

Ebiri finds the film well-acted and somber, but says its ideas about changing law enforcement remain underdeveloped. He praises the time spent with Costner and Harrelson, whose contrasting performances anchor the laconic road movie.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 March 2019 · C · Jesse Hassenger
57

Hassenger finds the film a plodding, dull drama with little to say about its criminals or lawmen. He singles out Costner and Harrelson’s irritable, car-bound exchanges as the moments that give it some life.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 March 2019 · ★★/4 · Chuck Bowen
50

Bowen finds the film’s reactionary outlook and stodgy classicism tedious, despite its dogged intensity. He praises Kevin Costner’s commanding, unsentimental performance as Frank Hamer.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
26 March 2019 · 3/2/2 · Adam Woodward
40

The critic finds the film a dull, unconvincing exercise in revisionist history. They single out its selective celebration of Frank Hamer while overlooking the troubling history bound up with his career.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 March 2019 · ★★ · Clarisse Loughrey
40

The critic finds the film’s sermon against romanticising Bonnie and Clyde tiresome and directionless. She praises the performances of Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson, but faults the film for avoiding why the outlaws appealed to the public.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
11 March 2019 · festival review · THR Staff
30*

The critic finds the film workmanlike and artistically inferior to its predecessor, criticizing its self-righteous lack of nuance. Costner and Harrelson give fine performances, but the review faults the film’s heavy-handed dramatic monologues.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 March 2019 · festival review · Charles Bramesco
10*

Bramesco finds the film an odious, unconvincing defense of its lawmen protagonists. He criticizes its efforts to excuse police brutality and its reactionary, insecure view of masculinity.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
15 March 2019 · ★★★ · David Crow
60

Crow finds the film old-fashioned but worthwhile, though it softens its moral exploration of frontier justice. He especially praises Woody Harrelson’s warmth, which helps enliven the long stretches of road-trip conversation.

Read the full review →
/Film
13 March 2019 · 5.5 out of 10 · Matt Donato
51*

Donato finds the film an overlong, sluggish drama whose historical perspective and strong cast cannot sustain its execution. He praises Costner and Harrelson’s performances, while criticizing the repetitive pacing and excessive length.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
29 March 2019 · Rob Harvilla
50*

Harvilla finds the film an OK, occasionally splendid hang, but ultimately an anticlimactic and overly scolding experience. He praises Costner and Harrelson’s charisma and the film’s handsome period details and vistas.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 March 2019 · D · Eric Vespe
37

The critic finds the film dull and overly familiar, despite its strong cast. He singles out the scene between Kevin Costner and William Sadler as its most dynamic moment.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
28 March 2019 · festival review
35*

The critic finds the film an interesting reframing of Bonnie and Clyde’s story, but says its slow pace keeps it from being entertaining or gripping. They praise the choice to keep Bonnie and Clyde’s faces hidden until the end, and single out the carefully tailored costumes for reinforcing the characters’ image and reality.

Read the full review →
Consequence
19 March 2019 · Randall Colburn
30*

Colburn finds the film’s revisionist mission intriguing but says its languid pace and one-dimensional treatment of Bonnie and Clyde undermine it. He praises the rapport and performances of Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson, especially Harrelson’s humor and vulnerability.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 March 2019 · Amber Wilkinson
30*

Wilkinson finds the film slow and undermined by its retrograde attitude toward women. She praises the rumpled pairing of Kevin Costner and Woody Harrelson as its main source of fun.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate