
The reviews are sharply divided on The History of Sound, with negative verdicts narrowly outnumbering positive ones. Praise clusters around Paul Mescal and Josh O’Connor’s performances and the folk-song recording scenes, which several critics find more intimate and affecting than the surrounding romance. Even some sceptical reviews respond to the singing, while admirers find the patient pace and melancholy atmosphere essential to the film’s emotional pull.
The central disagreement is over restraint: for supporters it makes the love story moving; for detractors it leaves the relationship cautious and unconvincing. Complaints about pacing recur even in favourable reviews, particularly around the middle and second half. The spread is wide: Deadline finds a haunting romance sustained by both leads and the music, whereas Variety finds little convincing feeling, praising O’Connor but faulting Mescal’s stillness. The Guardian also disputes one of the more common points of praise, finding the songs emotionally remote.
I
IndieWire
11 September 2025 · B · Ryan Lattanzio
77
Lattanzio finds the romance affecting and haunting, though its second half loses some emotional assurance. He praises Mescal’s understated performance and the film’s evocative music and patient atmosphere.
Read the full review →E
Empire
23 January 2026 · Laura Venning
75*
Venning finds the film profoundly affecting despite its muted pace and old-fashioned approach. She singles out the performances, especially Chris Cooper’s moving turn, and the songs’ power to preserve stories.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
21 May 2025 · festival review · David Rooney
75*
Rooney finds the film restrained and sometimes meandering, but ultimately a moving, melancholic romance. He especially praises Mescal and O’Connor’s performances and the folk music, which give the story its emotional force.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
21 May 2025 · festival review · Lee Marshall
71*
Marshall describes the film as an intense, restrained period drama. The headline singles out the clandestine romance between its two leads.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
23 January 2026 · James Mottram
70*
The review presents the film as a tender, decade-spanning love story likely to deepen its stars’ fanbases. It praises Oliver Hermanus’s telling as exquisite.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
festival review · Hannah Strong
65*
Strong finds the film a unique, moving romance, though its restraint and sagging pace may frustrate some viewers. She particularly praises Josh O’Connor’s performance and the soulful folk soundtrack.
Read the full review →The page does not expose the critic’s verdict. No praise or complaint is available to identify.
Read the full review →The URL identifies the page as a review of the specified film, but the article’s verdict is unavailable. The blocked page provides no specific praise or complaint to report.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
11 September 2025 · ★★½/4 · Marshall Shaffer
62
Shaffer finds the film most affecting when it evokes music’s ability to make the present feel suspended. He praises the soulful intimacy of Lionel and David recording folk music together, while noting that the second half loses vitality without David.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
22 May 2025 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60
The review presents the film as a slow, wistful romance rather than an unabashed triumph. It singles out the leads’ torch song to lost love as the film’s defining quality.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
22 January 2026 · ★★ · Jo-Ann Titmarsh
40
The critic finds the film monotonous and its story trite, despite the appealing leads. She praises Mescal and O’Connor’s performances and says the songs bring the film to life when the score gives way to voices.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
11 September 2025 · Justin Chang
40*
Chang finds the film beautiful but emotionally muted, with its central romance lacking sensual discovery and the filmmaking eventually slipping into inertia. He praises the folk-song recording scenes for their musical power and intimate encounters.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
28 May 2025 · festival review · BFI
35*
The critic finds the film sensitive and handsomely made but excessively decorous, lacking emotional intensity. Hadley Robinson’s nuanced, controlled performance is singled out as the film’s most striking element.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
12 September 2025 · Robert Abele
30*
Abele finds the romance overly cautious and emotionally muted, despite an eventually moving final act. He praises Paul Mescal’s affecting portrayal of sorrow-wracked loneliness.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
23 May 2025 · Jason Gorber
30*
Gorber finds the film disappointing, calling its queer romance repetitive and its music emotionally inert. He praises the premise of collecting songs in isolated backwoods settings, but says the story handles it too obviously and by rote.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
12 September 2025 · Alison Willmore
30*
Willmore finds the film too restrained to make its romance emotionally compelling. She praises the opening scenes and the unexpected closing sequence as the moments the film fully inhabits.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
21 May 2025 · festival review · Peter Bradshaw
25*
Bradshaw finds the film tasteful and laborious, unable to bring its love story to life. He faults the folk songs and romance for feeling preserved under glass rather than emotionally immediate.
Read the full review →V
Variety
21 May 2025 · festival review · Owen Gleiberman
10*
Gleiberman finds the romance listless and spiritually inexpressive, and says it fails to make its tragedy emotionally convincing. He praises Josh O’Connor’s vivid performance, while criticizing Paul Mescal’s stillness and the film’s overly pictorial style.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
21 May 2025 · festival review · Pete Hammond
95*
Hammond calls it a quietly masterful, haunting love story that stays with the viewer. He especially praises the performances by Paul Mescal and Josh O’Connor and the film’s beautifully arranged folk music.
Read the full review →The critic calls the film essential viewing and finds its story of thwarted love deeply moving. They single out the performances, exquisite roots music, and evocative cinematography for praise.
Read the full review →C
Collider
21 May 2025 · 8/10 · Therese Lacson
80
Lacson finds the film moving and heartbreaking, though its middle section loses momentum. She especially praises the folk songs and ballads as the story’s emotional anchor.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
21 May 2025 · festival review
75*
The headline suggests the film is affecting, though the review text was inaccessible. It singles out Paul Mescal and Josh O’Connor’s performances as heartbreaking.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
19 January 2026 · ★★★ · Josh Slater-Williams
60
The review finds the film too muted in its direction and pacing, though its verdict improves with an effective epilogue. It singles out Chris Cooper’s appearance for adding passion and crucial context to the story.
Read the full review →The critic finds the film exquisitely crafted but emotionally muted, leaving it more admired than loved. They praise its lush cinematography and sound, while faulting its restraint for keeping the central romance from igniting.
Read the full review →The critic finds the romance muted and unsatisfying. They fault the film’s uniform visual style for failing to convey the protagonist’s sensory experience.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
26 November 2025 · Marko Stojiljkovic
30*
The critic finds the film safe and mediocre, with its passion concentrated in the first half. The folk music is lively, but the romance never properly works.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate