Critics’ reviews

The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 82: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Incredible Shrinking Man

82
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Incredible Shrinking Man, with praise clustering around its effects, Grant Williams’s performance and Jack Arnold’s direction. The reviews credit the optical and practical effects with making the shrinking convincing, while Arnold’s framing turns familiar domestic spaces into threats. Williams’s sensitive performance gives the fantasy a human centre, and several critics find lasting force in the story’s simplicity, scares and fear of becoming insignificant.

The differences are chiefly between enthusiasm and more qualified enjoyment, rather than approval and rejection. Empire finds the paranoia dated and the mood downbeat, though it still praises the film’s handling of perspective. Slant Magazine admires its ambition but argues that its psychosexual implications remain underexplored. The supplied scores range from mixed to strongly positive, with no negative verdicts, although the inaccessible New York Times review leaves its reasons for reservation unverified.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

Jones calls the film a must-see classic that retains its irony, shock and power. He praises Grant Williams’s sensitive portrayal of a man pushed into a freak’s world.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 January 2022 · ★★★★½ · Chuck Bowen
90

Bowen sees the film as a startlingly personal and ambitious fantasy that gives its hero’s fears of irrelevance existential force. He praises the ingenious effects and Arnold’s direct visual style, while noting the film cannot fully explore the story’s psychosexual implications.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
90*

The review calls it one of the finest films in science fiction. It singles out the story’s simplicity as a strength.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 April 2006 · Ian Nathan
70*

Nathan finds the film very enjoyable despite its dated paranoia and downbeat mood. He praises how Arnold’s camera adopts the shrinking protagonist’s perspective, transforming familiar domestic spaces into threats.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1956 · Variety Staff
70*

The review is positive, highlighting the film’s uncompromising ending and effective scares. It particularly praises the optical effects that make the shrinking visually convincing.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 April 2003
64*

The page could not be read, so its verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the accessible material.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
10 November 2017 · Jennie Kermode
90*

Kermode finds the film daring, thrilling, and still among the best speculative-fiction films. She especially praises Grant Williams’s performance and the practical effects, particularly Jack Arnold’s confident framing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate