Critics’ reviews

The Killers (1946)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 83: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Killers

83
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics regard The Killers as a gripping noir thriller, with eight of the nine reviews positive and none wholly negative. Praise centres on Robert Siodmak’s direction and the expressive black-and-white photography, which the reviews credit with sustaining the film’s tense, fatalistic atmosphere. Burt Lancaster’s screen presence draws particular admiration, while Ava Gardner’s performance and Miklós Rózsa’s score also receive praise.

Reservations concern the writing and pace rather than the visual craft, though they produce one marked dissent from an otherwise favourable consensus. Slant Magazine admires the direction, especially a heist staged in one long shot, but finds that the flashbacks clutter Hemingway’s streamlined story. The AV Club is less persuaded, finding the film sluggish despite its expressive photography and preferring the livelier remake. Collider takes the opposite view of the two versions, judging the 1946 film stronger and finding its style deeply satisfying.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

Sloman calls it a powerful, influential thriller that helped define film noir. He particularly praises Burt Lancaster’s stunning debut and Ava Gardner’s career-defining performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
12 February 2008 · ★★★★★ · Wally Hammond
100

The critic presents the film as a quintessential noir thriller. The page singles out its taut, tense, terrific qualities.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
8 July 2015 · ★★★★½ · Chuck Bowen
90

Bowen finds Siodmak’s film ambitious and vividly directed, but says its flashback-heavy plotting clutters Hemingway’s streamlined story. He particularly praises the breathtaking heist staged in one long master shot.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 February 2008 · Philip French
90*

Philip French calls the film a classic and praises Siodmak as a supreme exponent of film noir. He singles out the atmospheric photography and Miklós Rózsa’s score as particular delights.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 April 1997 · Kevin Thomas
85*

Thomas says the film has worn very well and remains bleak, terse, and engrossingly fatalistic. He singles out Burt Lancaster, who commands the screen from his first scene.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 February 2008 · David Parkinson
80*

Parkinson gives the film a clearly positive verdict, praising its atmosphere and gripping action. He singles out Robert Siodmak’s Expressionist direction and the foreboding monochrome photography.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 February 2003 · Scott Tobias
50*

Tobias finds the 1946 film sluggish overall, despite its strengths, and contrasts it with the livelier remake. He praises Siodmak’s expressive black-and-white cinematography for conveying the story’s despairing tone.

Read the full review →
Collider
11 August 2015 · Andre Dellamorte
75*

The critic considers the 1946 film the stronger version and finds it stylish and deeply satisfying. He especially praises its black-and-white photography.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 July 2008 · Chris
75*

The critic considers it a gripping, stylish classic noir with abundant redeeming qualities, despite finding the script unmemorable. They single out Ava Gardner’s screen presence and the film’s tense atmosphere for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate