Critics’ reviews

The Killing of a Chinese Bookie (1976)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 57: 4 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Killing of a Chinese Bookie

57
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
2
The New Yorker
80*

The critic presents the film as a compelling, fatalistic crime drama. They praise Cassavetes’s staging of the gun battle and the club performer’s haunting routines.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2012 · William Thomas
75*

The review is positive about the film’s improvised character study and its emotionally affecting nightclub world. It particularly praises Gazzara’s restrained performance and expressive small gestures.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 July 2000 · Derek Malcolm
75*

Malcolm regards the film as flawed but unforgettable, capturing the absurdity and persistence of one man’s American dream. He especially praises Cassavetes’s dreamlike orchestration and the sincerity of the protagonist’s attachment to his club.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 February 1976
47*

The headline characterizes the film as a bland effort, indicating a negative verdict. No specific praise or criticism is available in the accessible page text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· MA
30*

The review presents the film as waywardly plotted and skeptical of gangster conventions. It singles out the gangsters’ attempts to distract Gazzara from his loyalty as central to the plot.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1975 · Variety Staff
10*

The critic pans the film as awful. They single out its cinematography as conspicuously poor, noting that no cinematographer is credited.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
19 July 2013 · ★★★★½ · Ashley Norris
90

The critic calls the film a must-see, praising its enigmatic performances and striking visuals. Ben Gazzara’s precise, captivating portrayal of Cosmo Vitelli is singled out as the standout.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate