Critics’ reviews

The Last Laugh (1924)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 78: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Last Laugh

78
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Last Laugh, with praise clustering around Murnau’s direction and Karl Freund’s inventive cinematography. The reviews repeatedly value the way images convey humiliation and inner distress, making the doorman’s experience vivid without relying on verbal explanation. Several also find substantial social criticism in its treatment of inequality, authority and individual dignity. Across the favourable responses, technical invention serves a recognisable concern for people whose standing in society is precarious.

The spread runs from wholehearted admiration to qualified respect, with six positive assessments, two mixed and none negative. Reservations centre on whether the storytelling sustains the achievement of the camerawork, particularly towards the close. Empire finds the ending unconvincing but still considers the film impressive. Eye for Film is more doubtful about how well it holds up, admiring Freund’s cinematography while finding the ending tacked on.

Slant Magazine
23 September 2008 · ★★★★/4 · Andrew Schenker
100

Schenker argues that the film is best understood as a horror story about a modern world that discards the old and infirm. He praises the camera work for making the doorman’s humiliation and inner states vivid.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
17 April 2013 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody presents the film as a powerful, prescient work about inequality and social authority. He especially praises its vivid warning about society’s treatment of individual dignity.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 March 2012
90*

The review calls Murnau’s film a masterpiece and an example of pure cinema. It singles out the absence of intertitles as a defining strength.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
75*

The page could not be accessed, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified. The available page information identifies it as a Great Movies review of the 1924 film.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 February 1925 · Mordaunt Hall
75*

The review gives Murnau’s German film a clearly positive verdict. It singles out the direction as particularly adroit and imaginative.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 March 1994 · MARK CHALON SMITH
70*

The critic finds the film visually striking and its story a meaningful blend of vanity, tragedy, and irony. He particularly praises Murnau’s direction and Karl Freund’s inventive camera work.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Alan Morrison
65*

Morrison finds the film’s ending falsely upbeat but considers the overall experience impressive. He especially praises Karl Freund’s groundbreaking cinematography, including the expressionistic drunken-dream sequence.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
2 February 2004 · Keith Dudhnath
50*

The critic finds the film technically impressive and historically important, but remains ambivalent about how well it holds up. They praise Karl Freund’s cinematography and criticise the ending as blatantly tacked on.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate