Critics’ reviews

The Last Samurai (2003)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 64: 4 positive, 5 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of The Last Samurai

64
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
3

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around the battle sequences, period craftsmanship and Ken Watanabe’s commanding presence. Even several detractors find the swordplay and spectacle effective, while the more enthusiastic critics see a satisfying blend of Western and samurai traditions. Tom Cruise’s performance divides opinion: Empire praises his restraint, but the Los Angeles Times finds his emotional range limited despite enjoying much of the spectacle.

The main reservations concern sentimentality, predictability and a romanticised account of cultural conflict. For some critics, those weaknesses are tolerable within a rousing action drama; for others, the historical fantasies and reverence for Cruise’s character make the film self-congratulatory. The spread is wide rather than a matter of minor caveats: admirers respond to the performances and action, while detractors find the storytelling simplistic even when they praise the staging.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Will Lawrence
95*

The critic gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it brisk, rich and more fun than a history lesson. He singles out Tom Cruise’s understated performance and Ken Watanabe’s commanding Katsumoto.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 December 2003 · Kirk Honeycutt
90*

Honeycutt calls the film a hugely satisfying entertainment and praises its successful blend of Western and samurai movie. He singles out the performances of Tom Cruise and Ken Watanabe, along with the film’s battle sequences and period craftsmanship.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sloan Freer
80

Freer describes the film as a sweeping action drama with a poignant personal odyssey. The review singles out its clash between old and new cultures, while noting its use of the “noble savage” image.

Read the full review →
Total Film
9 January 2004 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the film predictable but satisfying, with Tom Cruise giving one of his strongest performances. It praises Edward Zwick’s large-scale battle scenes as especially thrilling.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 December 2003 · Manohla Dargis
65*

Dargis finds the film flawed but ultimately enjoyable as an epic spectacle. She praises Ken Watanabe’s commanding presence and the pulse-pounding sword fights, while criticizing the film’s historical fantasies and Cruise’s limited emotional depth.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
3 December 2003 · Peter Brunette
64*

The page identifies Peter Brunette’s review of the 2003 film, but its critical verdict is unavailable in the accessible text. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the page.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 December 2003 · A.O. Scott
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be confirmed. Its headline suggests a contrast between the Wild West and the East, but no specific praise or complaint is available.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available page identifies the piece as a film review, but its verdict is unavailable. The visible description offers no clear praise or criticism to single out.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 December 2003 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

The critic finds the film simplistic and overly sentimental, concluding that it could use more edge. He praises the crisp direction and John Toll’s majestic cinematography of the Japanese countryside and samurai.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 January 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
35*

Bradshaw finds the film competently made but often silly and self-congratulatory. He praises the final battle scene, while criticising the film’s adoration of Tom Cruise and its conceited tone.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
30 November 2003 · David Denby
35*

Denby finds the film earnest and entertaining but weighed down by high-flown clichés and an inauthentic East-meets-West fantasy. He praises the samurai’s dramatic entrance through the mist and the slow-motion horses in the final battle.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 January 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
35*

The critic finds the film simplistic, sentimental and predictable, though it delivers the swordplay and spectacle promised. He singles out the slow-motion fight scenes as poetic, while faulting the story for offering no surprises.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate